Hi all,
Recently we discussed the need to improve the download page (on the
marketing list).
Christoph was so kind to help us to find again the existing wiki page on
the subject with the mockups, Download page whiteboard page:
Cor Nouws wrote (11-02-12 10:44)
Can this be done?
For in case the new download page may not be there before the 3.5.0 is
out (few days..), I've added a few words about latest/previous version
to the download page.
When the 3.5.0 is there, I suggest:
at the top (3.5.0)
This is the Our
Hi Marc, Andras,
Andras Timar wrote (11-02-12 08:56)
2012/2/11 Marc Parém...@marcpare.com:
I'm done. Could you take a look at it? Leave me a list of changes or
additions or comments etc. You need to log in edit mode.
Thanks. Had a quick look, and (apart from the suggestion from Andras)
On 2/11/12 10:55 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
When the 3.5.0 is there, I suggest:
at the top (3.5.0)
This is the Our latest, feature rich version,
has a bit more glitches
I would write this is our latest and greatest, feature rich version
below (3.4.5)
for conservative use, without the
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 01:37 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/11/12 12:13 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
I'm done. Could you take a look at it? Leave me a list of changes or
additions or comments etc. You need to log in edit mode.
Last bullet point on the page should read:
Some presentations
Thanks Andras, (long argument on Featured Selections)
Le 2012-02-11 02:56, Andras Timar a écrit :
I think in Featured Selection we should show screenshots, not only
text. Most readers will not read further. :) There are a few features
that should be included here (and there are a few which are
Hi Andras,
Le 2012-02-11 02:56, Andras Timar a écrit :
I think in Featured Selection we should show screenshots,
I have added some screenshots to this section.
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
m...@marcpare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
On 09-02-2012 12:57, Anders Holbøll wrote:
Note that the locale lb (presumably
Luxembourgish), that seems to be new for the 3.5rc3, is missing (also
from the live site).
I noticed that the tt locale, which according to wikipedia is Tatar,
is also missing. It is also used by the 3.5rc3
2012/2/11 Anders Holbøll anders...@gmail.com
On 09-02-2012 12:57, Anders Holbøll wrote:
Note that the locale lb (presumably
Luxembourgish), that seems to be new for the 3.5rc3, is missing (also
from the live site).
I noticed that the tt locale, which according to wikipedia is Tatar, is
What is the status of Java removal?
On Feb 11, 2012 12:26 PM, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn o...@sophia-louise.de
wrote:
Hi all,
maybe a silly question but:
When the release of 3.5.0 will start would we have
a)
two versions (3.5.0 and 3.4.5) or
b)
three versions (3.5.0, 3.4.5 and )
for
Hi,
It seems that the download page have been discussed a few times on this
list (about 6 months and about 12 months ago) and there are also few
bugs open. The mockups in the wiki all seemed much better than the
current page.
But being mockups they seemed a bit stylized to me. E.g.
- I
Hi,
2012/2/11 ol klaus-jürgen weghorn o...@sophia-louise.de:
maybe a silly question but:
When the release of 3.5.0 will start would we have
a)
two versions (3.5.0 and 3.4.5) or
b)
three versions (3.5.0, 3.4.5 and )
for downloading?
I think we should only offer two versions (3.4.5 and
On 11-02-2012 10:44, Cor Nouws wrote:
I think we must distinct between three situations/phases
1. 3.5.x must be promoted but with care
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1 or might even be skipped)
2. 3.5.x considered good enough
for non-expert installation and use
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1)
3.
2012/2/11 Anders Holbøll anders...@gmail.com
Hi,
It seems that the download page have been discussed a few times on this
list (about 6 months and about 12 months ago) and there are also few bugs
open. The mockups in the wiki all seemed much better than the current page.
But being mockups
2012/2/11 Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com
Hi,
2012/2/11 ol klaus-jürgen weghorn o...@sophia-louise.de:
maybe a silly question but:
When the release of 3.5.0 will start would we have
a)
two versions (3.5.0 and 3.4.5) or
b)
three versions (3.5.0, 3.4.5 and )
for downloading?
Hi Rogerio, *,
Am 07.02.2012 00:30 schrieb Rogerio Luz Coelho:
Please send the footers of the pt-br lists to him, it will facilitate
his translations
Rogerio
done :o))
[..]
Gruß/regards
--
Friedrich
Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/
LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images
--
Hi Volker, *,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/11 ol klaus-jürgen weghorn o...@sophia-louise.de:
maybe a silly question but:
When the release of 3.5.0 will start would we have
a)
two versions (3.5.0 and 3.4.5) or
Yes.
b)
three versions
2012/2/11 Olav Dahlum odah...@gmail.com
2012/2/11 Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com
Hi,
2012/2/11 ol klaus-jürgen weghorn o...@sophia-louise.de:
maybe a silly question but:
When the release of 3.5.0 will start would we have
a)
two versions (3.5.0 and 3.4.5) or
b)
three
2012/2/11 Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
Cor Nouws wrote (11-02-12 10:44)
Can this be done?
For in case the new download page may not be there before the 3.5.0 is out
(few days..), I've added a few words about latest/previous version to the
download page.
When the 3.5.0 is there, I
Hi Drew, all,
drew wrote (11-02-12 14:39)
- Basically is answered with a.: the version can be installed by all,
without trouble and we show a clear link leading to information.
I would strongly argue in the reverse.
Ah, sad. I had hoped (dreamed prolly) that with my idea we had found
Hi Anders,
Anders Holbøll wrote (11-02-12 21:24)
I believe that 3.5.0 should be advertised as the default recommended
version. If it isn't ready for that, I would assume that the developers
had put out another release candidate!
I guess the developers think it's ready for the release.
Italo Vignoli wrote (11-02-12 11:44)
On 2/11/12 10:55 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
When the 3.5.0 is there, I suggest:
I would write this is our latest and greatest, feature rich version
Agree.
below (3.4.5)
I would write for conservative users, thoroughly tested, without the
latest features
Hi Luc, *,
Luc Castermans wrote (11-02-12 20:26)
Nice pictures on the white board! Nevertheless I think optically we should
provide one button to the version we want to download at that moment in
time.
Thanks!
Alas I fail to see how to predict what kind of user is running the
browser, which
Hi Olav,
Olav Dahlum wrote (11-02-12 22:07)
Scaring, insulting, and driving away customers/users won't promote or sell
LibreOffice. Instead, highlight the features in the various versions.
Meaning, market 3.5 for what it is; a faster generation etc etc, and 3.4 as
something more of a LTS
Le 2012-02-11 16:56, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Olav,
Olav Dahlum wrote (11-02-12 22:07)
Scaring, insulting, and driving away customers/users won't promote or
sell
LibreOffice. Instead, highlight the features in the various versions.
Meaning, market 3.5 for what it is; a faster generation etc
Hi Cor, hi Luc, all!
Great to see the recent activity concerning that topic :-)
Am Samstag, den 11.02.2012, 22:51 +0100 schrieb Cor Nouws:
Hi Luc, *,
Luc Castermans wrote (11-02-12 20:26)
Nice pictures on the white board! Nevertheless I think optically we should
provide one button to
HI Drew et al
Le 2012-02-11 08:39, drew a écrit :
I would strongly argue in the reverse.
They likely use less of the application and therefore:
- are least likely to benefit from the new features
- least likely to appreciate the value of new features they find
- least able to deal with any
On 11/02/12 22:56, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Olav,
Olav Dahlum wrote (11-02-12 22:07)
Scaring, insulting, and driving away customers/users won't promote or
sell
LibreOffice. Instead, highlight the features in the various versions.
Meaning, market 3.5 for what it is; a faster generation etc etc,
On 11/02/12 23:46, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2012-02-11 16:56, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Olav,
Olav Dahlum wrote (11-02-12 22:07)
Scaring, insulting, and driving away customers/users won't promote or
sell
LibreOffice. Instead, highlight the features in the various versions.
Meaning, market 3.5 for
Apologies, I did not realize what was happening on the download page.
Sorry for jumping in so late.
On 2/11/12 11:54 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
Looking at the new proposals at [1], the major difference (I seem to be
able to spot) is the decision to present LibO 3.5.0 Early Adopters as
the
On 12/02/12 00:34, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Apologies, I did not realize what was happening on the download page.
Sorry for jumping in so late.
On 2/11/12 11:54 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
Looking at the new proposals at [1], the major difference (I seem to be
able to spot) is the decision to
Hi Marc,
2012/2/11 Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com:
Hi Andras,
Le 2012-02-11 02:56, Andras Timar a écrit :
I think in Featured Selection we should show screenshots, not only
text. Most readers will not read further.:) There are a few features
that should be included here (and there are a few
Hi Andras,
Thanks for the page, looks good.
Le 2012-02-11 19:30, Andras Timar a écrit :
Many thanks for your work! I read your e-mail about Featured list. It
is interesting what you think. However, I think Featured list is
important. We have many new features. We cannot expect that the press
Hello Anders, all,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:01, Anders Holbøll anders...@gmail.com wrote:
http://andershol.github.com/cms-code-demo/select-type.html
Just some of my thoughts, x86 and x86_64 might be renamed to 32 bit
and 64 bit respectively.
Thanks for your mockups! :-)
Best Regards,
--
Hi, Anders,
thank you for your proposals.
Some thoughts from my point of view.
Am 11.02.2012 21:01, schrieb Anders Holbøll:
I thought it would be interesting to see what the mockups (I mostly
looked at Nics and Christophs proposals) would look like with real
data. Since I am a developer, my
35 matches
Mail list logo
