mclasen added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Either of those sound good to me
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/807
___
websites mailing list --
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Or, if we can go more wordy, something like:
> You only need to download something here to do a fresh installation. To
> upgrade, [follow these
> instructions](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/upgrading.html).
``
To
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
The link should be
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/upgrading.html
(Right now, only en-US exists, but hopefully that'll be expanded soon.)
How about "[Upgrade
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Please file an Infrastructure ticket for this issue, we cannot help you with
this. For spamming reasons Infra decided to allow wiki edits only to
contributors who are at least in one group other than CLA (Contributor License
The status of the issue: `Wiki access instructions are unclear` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been updated to: Closed as Won't fix / Can't fix by
robyduck.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/829
___
websites mailing list --
mclasen added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
That does not really address what I filed this issue for.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/807
___
websites mailing list
The status of the issue: `Recommend graphical system upgrade` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been updated to: Open by mclasen.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/807
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
sijis added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
OK.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/576
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
abitrolly added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> What were the steps to reproduce this?
I guess remove self from all groups except CLA here -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/list/A*
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
sijis added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
What were the steps to reproduce this?
I'll also note, I don't believe its something we, the websites team, will be
able to assist much, as the wiki is an
[infrastructure](https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure) component.
``
To
abitrolly reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you
are following:
``
Applying for privilege to edit wiki pages is hard.
You need to know what is CLA, what are groups,
how to connect account to a group. And error
message `You need to have at least CLA+1 (cla)`
is
The status of the issue: `https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/ unclear
about Fedora Media Writer` of project: `fedora-websites` has been updated to:
Closed as Fixed by sijis.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/802
___
websites mailing
sijis added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
MR #823 has been merged.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/802
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
The status of the issue: `Fedora Media Writer (download above)` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by sijis.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/814
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
sijis added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Fixed in
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/c/93bab794551daacee258c4a8f63a345c41f1e865.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/814
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@robyduck Is there a framework we can use to make sure that you get the
information you need to implement changes in a more clear and timely fashion?
Is there a normal schedule for when the websites are in staging that we can
make
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We were just told aarch64 is primary, so images are not anymore in
fedora-secondary?, that's all we got. We also cannot look at all changes and
guess how the WGs want to have them. I am not aware and personally not much
interested
pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> 1) We were told Cloud should be there, and it's not since F28 we list Cloud
> on alt.fpo. Please discuss this internally and then open a dedicated issue if
> needed.
Cloud should, the netinst for cloud should not
> 2) Isn't
The status of the issue: `Recommend graphical system upgrade` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by robyduck.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/807
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Fixed in commit 7cba01b
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/807
___
websites mailing list --
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Links are fixed in commit c917d2b.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/827
___
websites mailing list --
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@dustymabe yes, thank you very much ;)
But you see there is difference from having a "should be..." and "we discussed
it here and want it like that". (PRs are even better :
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> @dustymabe can you figure out what we should do? i.e. AtomicWorkstation was
> requested to be on the Workstation page, not in some Atomic section. We need
> an official and already discussed request, our pagure is not the place
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@dustymabe can you figure out what we should do? i.e. AtomicWorkstation was
requested to be on the Workstation page, not in some Atomic section. We need an
official and already discussed request, our pagure is not the place where to
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
1) We were told Cloud should be there, and it's not since F28 we list Cloud on
alt.fpo. Please discuss this internally and then open a dedicated issue if
needed.
2) Isn't aarch64 primary? We changed the links the same way also for
The status of the issue: `Issues with alt.fp.o for architectures` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been updated to: Closed as Invalid by robyduck.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/827
___
websites mailing list --
The issue: `getfedora for friulian` of project: `fedora-websites` has been
assigned to `robyduck` by robyduck.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/825
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The issue: `add alternate architectures to atomic download page` of project:
`fedora-websites` has been assigned to `ryanlerch` by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/828
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
we've discussed this with ryan lerch recently at the fedora infra hackfest. He
is going to work on this issue.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/828
bex added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I'd like to use this for docs.fedoraproject.org too :)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/821
___
websites mailing list --
sharkcz added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
CC @sinnykumari
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/828
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
pbrobinson reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you
are following:
``
There should be a section in https://getfedora.org/en_GB/atomic/download/
titled "Atomic host for Alternate architectures" that lists the aarch64 and
ppc64le atomic artifacts. Atomic has supported
sharkcz added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We should have both Cloud and Container for s390x via
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Atomic_Cloud_and_Docker_images_for_s390x
- seems the actual availability depends whether the compose succeeded in
creating them, it varies
pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Also s390x is missing container images:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/28/Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-28-1.1.s390x.tar.xz
But I'm not 100% sure of the status of that, @sharkcz
pbrobinson reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you
are following:
``
There's a few issues with the alt.fp.o site:
Wording: the "These are additional architectures supported by Fedora beyond the
standard set." phrase is confusing, what is a "standard set"? With
pbrobinson reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you
are following:
``
As of Fedora 28 aarch64 is a Primary architecture and as such needs to be
referenced from the main Fedora Server download page
https://getfedora.org/en_GB/server/download/
That only lists x86_64
tmtfx reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are
following:
``
Greetings,
I'm the coordinator for friulian language, I'd like to publish my partial
translation for getfedora published on zanata; It's about 90% done.
Best regards
Fabio Tomat
``
To reply, visit
37 matches
Mail list logo
