Matt.Ingenthron at Sun.COM wrote:
> On 12/23/08 15:17, Matt.Ingenthron at Sun.COM wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081204-hands-on-opensolaris-2008-11-a-major-step-forward-for-sun.html
>>
>>
>> Has anyone emailed the author or looked into this?
>
> Looking at the discu
Jyri Virkki wrote:
>
> A technicality: See
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/interface-taxonomy/
> "Obsolete" is now considered a modifier, so your interfaces which were
> "Uncommitted" become "Obsolete Uncommitted" and so forth.
>
I thought as much, I've seen it used both ways
as scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20081223/e386d5c0/attachment.html>
nthron
http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/
email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20081223/f12ea62c/attachment.html>
Amanda Waite wrote:
>
[Responding in webstack-discuss since that's the most appropriate home
for Web Stack work.]
> In order to update RubyGems in the SUNWruby18 packages we need to
> obsolete some of the interfaces that RubyGems have dropped between
> versions 0.9.4 and the current version - 1
