Yes. It's got a small memory leak that I haven't tracked down yet. I
wrote it a few months ago, but the memory leak pissed me off and I
haven't looked at it lately. Maybe with the time away from it, the leak
will be obvious now.
Jay
Tavis Rudd wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2001 18:29, Jay L
I'll look at it this weekend. I'll be curious to see what you had to
tweak to get it to compile for you on Windows, as I've been compiling it
on Win for a few months and thought I had committed all those tweaks to CVS.
Anyway, it's nice to get some contrinutions on this code. Now if I
could
On Thursday 31 May 2001 18:29, Jay Love wrote:
> I've got a webkit cgi adapter in C that does have the
> retry feature. It shares code with the ISAPI module ...
Jay,
what's the ISAPI module you're referring to? I haven't heard
of it before. Is it an equivalent of mod_webkit for IIS?
Tavis
I haven't finished reading this thread, but let me put me 2 cents in.
I am ready to switch to using Threaded as the default on both platforms.
The original purpose for Async was to make sure the AppServer didn't get
bogged down with any slow requests. As long as we are communicating through
a we
We've got some ideas about how to handle that kind of stuff. In our current
architecture, it can all be factored out into the RequestHandler class.
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Bicking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:53 AM
Subject: Re:
I've got a webkit cgi adapter in C that does have the retry feature. It
shares code with the ISAPI module and obviously with the Win and Linux
versions of itself. But, It can't share much code with mod_webkit, due to
apache's use of its own memory management routines and socket routines.
BTW, I
