> At 11:44 AM 10/1/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> >So, I'm thinking we should put this fixed version of
> Cookie.py directly
> >into Webware and force it to use its own fixed private copy
> for any Python
> >version prior to 2.2. Does anyone disagree?
> >
> >I suppose before we do that, w
At 11:44 AM 10/1/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>So, I'm thinking we should put this fixed version of Cookie.py directly
>into Webware and force it to use its own fixed private copy for any Python
>version prior to 2.2. Does anyone disagree?
>
>I suppose before we do that, we should make sure
OK. Does this seem to work for your test case?
Jay
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies hang Webkit
>
>
> I checked
So, I'm thinking we should put this fixed version of Cookie.py directly
into Webware and force it to use its own fixed private copy for any Python
version prior to 2.2. Does anyone disagree?
I suppose before we do that, we should make sure that the fixed version is
still compatible with Pytho
# Any word or empty string
r")" # End of group 'val'
r"\s*;?" # Probably ending in a semi-colon
)
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian
&g
as well.
>
> Thanks for tracking this down.
>
> Jay
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:16 PM
> > To: Geoff Talvola; Love, Jay; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [We
20, 2001 6:16 PM
> To: Geoff Talvola; Love, Jay; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies hang Webkit
>
>
> Since I'm going on vacation as soon as I fix this problem, I
> decided I'd better try again. I didn't write the crappy
> cookie w
ot;+ _LegalCharsPattValue +""# Any word
r")" # End of group 'val'
r"\s*;?" # Probably ending in a semi-colon
)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Well, I found the person with the bad cookies. The offending cookie is
has two equal signs in it! Is that legal??
"WWWLYCOS=SATISFACTIONSURVEY=N;"
Does anyone have a suggestion of how we can handle this exception
gracefully or improve the parser?
I printed out the offending cookie and the exc
At 11:10 AM 9/13/01 -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>Ok, here's the diffs. The only other change than the two exception
>handlers is a print "." that somehow fixes the FreeBSD restart problem.
I checked in your diffs to CVS with minor changes (comments and added
"import sys" to one module).
--
-
Ok, here's the diffs. The only other change than the two exception
handlers is a print "." that somehow fixes the FreeBSD restart problem.
Thanks,
Jeff
> At 10:04 AM 9/13/01 -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >I had forgotten about this until last night when someone
> with (I assume)
> >corrupted
At 10:04 AM 9/13/01 -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>I had forgotten about this until last night when someone with (I assume)
>corrupted cookies hung WebKit again by killing off all the threads. Can
>we have two exception handlers? One to catch corrupted cookies and
>another to prevent unexpected exc
vola'; Jeff Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies hang Webkit
>
>
> Yeah, a try: except: around handleRequest would catch a lot of this, I
> THINK, but it makes me a little nervous to do a catch that
> big. It just
> seems a little cludgy. But
At 04:46 PM 9/4/01 -0500, Love, Jay wrote:
>Yeah, a try: except: around handleRequest would catch a lot of this, I
>THINK, but it makes me a little nervous to do a catch that big. It just
>seems a little cludgy. But I guess as long as the except logs the error
>somehow (just print to stdout), its
t any of this, but why was that particular exception
hanging the thread?
Jay
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:35 PM
> To: Jeff Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies ha
At 05:00 PM 9/4/01 -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>I guess there's a bug in Cookie.py but shouldn't AppServer be more
>robust? A bug like this should cause an error page (which it does) but
>it shouldn't be able to hang the entire WebKit server. If we put a
>try/except around handleRequest would tha
I guess there's a bug in Cookie.py but shouldn't AppServer be more
robust? A bug like this should cause an error page (which it does) but
it shouldn't be able to hang the entire WebKit server. If we put a
try/except around handleRequest would that make it harder for bad
servlet code to hang the
At 03:16 PM 9/4/01 -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>Someone hitting my site must have a bad cookie and when the Cookie
>parser fails, the thread just hangs. Once all threads are hung the site
>stops responding. I don't know the code well enought to know where to
>put the try/except but I think there
except:
pass
thanks Jay :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Love, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:32 PM
> To: Jeff Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies hang Webkit
&
As just a quick fix, I'd wrap the call to Cookie.load in HTTPRequest.
Jay
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Webware-devel] Bad cookies hang Webkit
>
Someone hitting my site must have a bad cookie and when the Cookie
parser fails, the thread just hangs. Once all threads are hung the site
stops responding. I don't know the code well enought to know where to
put the try/except but I think there should be a general try/except
around handleReques
21 matches
Mail list logo
