On Thursday 04 July 2002 02:11 am, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> btw, is someone still working on the MiddleKit? Most of the comments
> are from a while ago. I'm just asking because, well, some of the
> code is a bit confusing and the general approach for supporting
> multiple databases seems a bit
On Monday 03 June 2002 09:36 am, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch against MiddleKit to provide preliminary support
> for PostgreSQL. We are using the patch locally, it seems to work
> just fine. Its a bit unpolished but, well,... here it is :-)
Were you able to run the Midd
Il lun, 2002-06-03 alle 18:36, Ingo Luetkebohle ha scritto:
> The reason that a patch against the PostgreSQL python bindings is required
> is that MiddleKit makes uses of a database-assigned ID for newly
> inserted database objects. It retrieves this through a MySQL-specific
> server function.
Good stuff!
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch against MiddleKit to provide preliminary support
> for PostgreSQL. We are using the patch locally, it seems to work
> just fine. Its a bit unpolished but, well,... here it is :-)
>
> Known issues:
> -
Hi,
attached is a patch against MiddleKit to provide preliminary support
for PostgreSQL. We are using the patch locally, it seems to work
just fine. Its a bit unpolished but, well,... here it is :-)
Known issues:
- sample data not supported
- requires a patch against the Postg
