Re: [Webware-devel] SourceForge trackers

2005-10-28 Thread Jason Hildebrand
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 06:16 +0200, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > In order to consolidate things a bit, I have now > closed/disabled the following on SourceForge: > > - the "Support Request" tracker: >has never been used anyway, use webware-discuss instead > > - the task manager: >has not b

Re: [Webware-devel] SourceForge trackers

2005-10-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
In order to consolidate things a bit, I have now closed/disabled the following on SourceForge: - the "Support Request" tracker: has never been used anyway, use webware-discuss instead - the task manager: has not been used since years; I have copied ideas and tasks which were still open t

Re: [Webware-devel] SourceForge trackers

2005-10-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
By the way, there is also the future.html file in the Docs folder with open issues. So the to do items are really scattered everywhere. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Co

[Webware-devel] SourceForge trackers

2005-10-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
I'm currently going through the tracker and task items on the SourceForge page, closing all tasks that have been done, are not applicable any more or are simly obsolete due to long time. Do we need all 4 trackers (Bugs, Support Requests, Patches, Feature Requests) and the task manager? Maybe a

[Webware-devel] Sourceforge [was: Re: Website RFC]

2003-03-31 Thread Tom von Schwerdtner
Seriously, I could stick a post-it to my cats ass and throw her into the wild and the message would get to most of you before any emails that go through SourceForge. Slowest list *ever*. -Tom, who demands all his free stuff to be top of the line. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

RE: [Webware-devel] sourceforge patches vs bugs?

2002-12-13 Thread Geoffrey Talvola
Here are the basic release procedures from the 0.7 documentation: http://webware.sourceforge.net/Webware-0.7/Docs/ReleaseProcedures.html As far as qualifications, you should probably be a Linux/Unix developer and you should have some familiarity with CVS, tools like tar, and Webware. You do NOT n

Re: [Webware-devel] sourceforge patches vs bugs?

2002-12-13 Thread Stuart Donaldson
to do it myself. - Geoff -Original Message- From: Stuart Donaldson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:44 PM To: Webware devel Subject: [Webware-devel] sourceforge patches vs bugs? I realized that I have put a couple of patches up on sourceforge.net in the patch ar

RE: [Webware-devel] sourceforge patches vs bugs?

2002-12-13 Thread Geoffrey Talvola
there are still some things in progress like reworking the documentation. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to do it myself. - Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Stuart Donaldson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:44 PM > To: Webware deve

[Webware-devel] sourceforge patches vs bugs?

2002-12-12 Thread Stuart Donaldson
I realized that I have put a couple of patches up on sourceforge.net in the patch area that actually fix bugs. In the interest of completeness, should I enter bugs against these? Or is having the patch in the patch database sufficient to get them looked at, and incorporated into the CVS tree?

[Webware-devel] Sourceforge

2001-06-07 Thread Mike Orr
BTW, didja all notice that Sourceforge lists are back up to their normal speed? -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if mail problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://iron.cx/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol ___ Webware-devel m