RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-05 Thread Cody, John (OFT)
legal advice - if you need legal advice, please consult your own attorney.] -Original Message- From: Steven Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:47 AM To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List Subject: RE: is this practice O.K.? Dr. Fairley's original post asked

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Cody, John (OFT)
] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 5:12 PM To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List Subject: RE: is this practice O.K.? Dear Dr. Fairley, What a great question! We believe that HIPAA allows this practice and in doing so, provides patient with privacy protections. For nearly 2000 years physicians, nurses

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Matthew Rosenblum
: is this practice O.K.? John, We believe that HHS is clear in the use of the term third party in its definition of treatment. The following guidance is provided in the Preamble to the (initial) Privacy rules: The proposed rule defined 'treatment' as the provision of health care by, or the coordination

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Cody, John (OFT)
Rosenblum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 6:39 PM To: Cody, John (OFT); 'WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List' Subject: RE: is this practice O.K.? John, You are quite right that the proposed rule was modified, and that is why we included BOTH versions in our second response

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Matthew Rosenblum
, November 02, 2003 6:44 PM To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List Subject: RE: is this practice O.K.? Clarified it? They removed the limiting language -- they EXPANDED it, didn't they? :-) Thanks for your thoughts, Matt, much appreciated. What do others think? Thanks, John John C. Cody, Esq. NYS

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Cody, John (OFT)
advice, please consult your own attorney.] -Original Message- From: Matthew Rosenblum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 7:02 PM To: Cody, John (OFT); 'WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List' Subject: RE: is this practice O.K.? John, HHS made the modification

Re: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread DKHGRMI
Sounds like some undue stress on a question that probably cannot be answered out of court. The regulatory language provides for no end of possible interpretations and we can only guess at what the courts will decide -- and they get the advantage of a specific set of circumstances (and, I think

RE: is this practice O.K.?

2003-11-02 Thread Moya Gray
Esq. 1283 Honokahua Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96825 808-396-6731 808-381-3732 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 4:55 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: Re: is this practice O.K.?Sounds like some undue str

is this practice O.K.?

2003-10-31 Thread Fairley2
The practice that I am going to describe is quite common in our community but I am not sure it is acceptable. I wanted the opinion of the experts on this list. Occassionally, we run into a problem with a patient who seems to be doctor hopping and getting multiple prescriptions for narcotics.