Hi,
Patrick Aljord wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it a little disheartening that what was initially announced as a
competition to choose a new name has now been announced as a unilateral
decision... at the very least, I would have liked
Hi,
Patrick Aljord wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:32 PM, EdPimentl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not shorten the name to GoPhone... gPhone wPhone
And leverage the brand that WengoPhone built.
I think it's too late, the domains are registered already.
wphone is for sale, and I don't
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd personally like to mark the break from the past, and choose a very
different name. Qute* comes across to me as not very qute, and quite
possibly contentious with Trolltech trademarks.
Don't worry, Trolltech didn't get
Just My thoughts :
As we all know, We still haven't a decent solution for SIP video/audio/text.
As Wengophone as its main features based on SIP , including SIP in its
name, would help visibility about the protocol and not the software.
As people currently don't say send me a yahoo or a gmail
Why not shorten the name to GoPhone... gPhone wPhone
And leverage the brand that WengoPhone built.
-E
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:33 PM, michel memeteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just My thoughts :
As we all know, We still haven't a decent solution for SIP
video/audio/text.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:32 PM, EdPimentl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not shorten the name to GoPhone... gPhone wPhone
And leverage the brand that WengoPhone built.
I think it's too late, the domains are registered already.
___
Wengophone-devel
Hi Vadim,
Be careful to check if you're infringing on QT trademarks - the QT guys
pronounce if Cute (same as Qute), so you may be getting a note from
Norway if you stick with this name.
Cheers,
Dave.
Vadim Lebedev wrote:
Folks,
I've really intended to arrange for some kind of vote on the
