Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Feedback on automated name changing process

2007-04-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:45:06 +0200, Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I understand correctly you are complaining that after a rename and a minor change to the renamed file users having an older copy of the working copy need to fetch the full file instead of only the delta

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Preparing for 1.3.2

2007-04-24 Thread Nils Kneuper
Okay, looks like all the real blockers are fixed. If everything is alright and noone starts to shout that I should not do so, I will release tomorrow in the afternoon (april 25th, about 17:00 GMT+2/CEST (Central European Summer Time)). So now my tasks for all of you: 1) Send a mail if there are

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Preparing for 1.3.2

2007-04-24 Thread Mark de Wever
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:56:14PM +0200, Nils Kneuper wrote: Okay, looks like all the real blockers are fixed. If everything is alright and noone starts to shout that I should not do so, I will release tomorrow in the afternoon (april 25th, about 17:00 GMT+2/CEST (Central European Summer

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Adding new campaigns to mainline, some guidelines

2007-04-24 Thread Nils Kneuper
Okay, what is the status of this? Do we have some guidelines ready so that I can announce this shortly after 1.3.2 (maybe this weekend)? For what exactly should I ask in that announcement? Should I also ask for general maintainers? Or just for campaigns? Would be nice to get some comments...

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Adding new campaigns to mainline, some guidelines

2007-04-24 Thread jeremy rosen
well, apparently the debate part has more or less finished here... the next thing to do would be to synththise that post, and put it either in developer discussion for further comment/looking for a SP maintainer or directly in the campaign forum, locked, as a policy statement... I don't have

[Wesnoth-dev] wesnoth and python

2007-04-24 Thread Jörg Hinrichs
Hi all, there seems to be some irritation about the python version that is shipped within the windows package. Here are some facts: 1. Python 2.3 is completely open source without any restrictions. Python 2.4 / 2.5 is compiled with a microsoft runtime dll that needs to be redistributed.

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Preparing for 1.3.2

2007-04-24 Thread me
I don't know how i didn't notice it previously, but the bridge is not drawn over the swamp. I gave it a shot, but couldn't do any better than to draw the bridge over swamp-water but without the reeds. I'll do that, but hopefully Mog can put it back together the way it's supposed to be. This isn't

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] wesnoth and python

2007-04-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 00:01:04 +0200, Jörg Hinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Python 2.4 / 2.5 is compiled with a microsoft runtime dll that needs to be redistributed. Redistribution requires a legal installation of Visual Studio.Net 2003. I doubt that that is compatible with the GPL. It

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Preparing for 1.3.2

2007-04-24 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Mark de Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:56:14PM +0200, Nils Kneuper wrote: Okay, looks like all the real blockers are fixed. If everything is alright and noone starts to shout that I should not do so, I will release tomorrow in the afternoon (april 25th, about 17:00