I second this suggestion - it allows sufficient freedom to express
meaningful content, since anything that would push us into an R
rating would be very awkward to try and express within wesnoth.
Furthermore, it offers an extremely large body of work to act as a
legal precedent, per se - we
NOT a blocker, but I would like to rework the
___
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
OK, there's really 2 parts to this suggestion:
1) mainline Wesnoth should have clearer content ratings
2) mainline Wesnoth should contain more mature content than
it has in the past.
I don't have a problem with #1.
I am against #2. I'm proud of the fact that i can recommend
Wesnoth as a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why should we change the de-facto rating of Wesnoth to accommodate
the addition of terms like tree-shagger? That would be a case of the
tail wagging the dog.
We were already at PG-13 in MPAA terms. I was suggesting we adopt ESRB T
rather than ESRB E10+
Rating systems are notoriously bad guides for making decisions about
this issue. We might already be some particular rating based upon the
violence in wesnoth, but that does not mean we should raise our
language use, sexual inuendos, and drug use to match.
Personally, I would find a comparison
