Re: About Automated Unit Test for Wget

2008-04-06 Thread Yoshihiro Tanaka
2008/4/5, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Stenberg wrote: This system allows us to write unit-tests if we'd like to, but mostly so far we've focused to test it system-wide. It is hard enough for us! Yeah, I thought I'd seen

Re: About Automated Unit Test for Wget

2008-04-06 Thread Yoshihiro Tanaka
2008/4/5, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Stenberg wrote: This system allows us to write unit-tests if we'd like to, but mostly so far we've focused to test it system-wide. It is hard enough for us! Yeah, I thought I'd seen

Re: About Automated Unit Test for Wget

2008-04-06 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't see what you see wrt making the code harder to follow and reason about (true abstraction rarely does, AFAICT, I was referring to the fact that adding an abstraction layer requires learning about the abstraction layer, both its concepts and its

Re: About Automated Unit Test for Wget

2008-04-06 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Micah Cowan wrote: Yeah. But we're not doing streaming. And you still haven't given much explanation for _why_ it's as hard and time-consuming as you say. Making a claim and demonstrating it are different things, I think. To be clear, I'm not