Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Would it make sense to simply always use this check? > > In my mind, this is what the function-exists test should do, but I > thought that I'd leave the existing test do what it thinks is right > first since there might be cases and systems around tha

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-06 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Believe it or not, I wasn't aware of that. Furthermore, I'm pretty certain > that older versions of Autoconf handled HPUX just fine. The level of > overengineering that went into Autoconf in the last several years is > appalling. :-( I agree with this

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-04 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >> It seems configure's way of checking for select simply fails on HPUX. >> :-( > > The default configure test that checks for the presence of a > function is certainly not optimal for all platforms and > envi

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-03 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > It seems configure's way of checking for select simply fails on HPUX. > :-( The default configure test that checks for the presence of a function is certainly not optimal for all platforms and environments. In curl's configure script, we've resorted to

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-03 Thread nvarney
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > For the second point. I didn't compile wget myself, I use the version published > on HP-UX Software Porting Center (http://hpux.connect.org.uk/) > So I get the official

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-03 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > For the second point. I didn't compile wget myself, I use the version published > on HP-UX Software Porting Center (http://hpux.connect.org.uk/) > So I get the official sources and HP-UX Software Porting Center sources and > compile both version. > > Results are the sam

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-02 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Here is a trace of system calls during execution of 'wget -t 1 -T 10 > http://www.admin.edt.fr/supervision/test.jsp' > > (See attached file: wget_trace.txt) Thanks. Apparently Wget isn't even calling select! I see two possibilities: 1. Something in your configuratio

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-01 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Here is the result of "wget -t 1 -T 10 -d > http://www.admin.edt.fr/supervision/test.jsp"; command on HP-UX with version > 1.8.1 and 1.9.1 > With version 1.9.1, time out never occurs I'm not aware of significant differences between the two versions in that department.

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-06-01 Thread nvarney
Here is the result of "wget -t 1 -T 10 -d http://www.admin.edt.fr/supervision/test.jsp"; command on HP-UX with version 1.8.1 and 1.9.1 With version 1.9.1, time out never occurs See below Best regards Nicolas Varney A test with wget 1.8.1 on HP-UX : # wget -t 1 -T 10 -d http://www.admin.edt.

Re: -T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-05-27 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On platform HP-UX 11.00 PA-RISC > wget version 1.9.1 > -T parameter not work in a certain condition > > On a deadly HTTP server (HTTP server accept connection, but never send data) > wget wait indefinitely Could you post a debug log or (better) trace output?

-T parameter on HP-UX port

2004-05-26 Thread nvarney
On platform HP-UX 11.00 PA-RISC wget version 1.9.1 -T parameter not work in a certain condition On a deadly HTTP server (HTTP server accept connection, but never send data) wget wait indefinitely Regards Nicolas Varney