Here is the new version of the patch, with print_*_number_to_string
replaced with a single number_to_static_string, which does the buffer
ring stunt we discussed (and has a more accurate name to boot).
Please try it out and let me know if it works for you. I'd especially
be interested in
El 20/02/2005, a las 15:02, Hrvoje Niksic escribió:
Here is the new version of the patch, with print_*_number_to_string
replaced with a single number_to_static_string, which does the buffer
ring stunt we discussed (and has a more accurate name to boot).
Please try it out and let me know if it
El 20/02/2005, a las 16:52, Hrvoje Niksic escribió:
Greg Hurrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a patch against the current CVS version, or against 1.9.1?
It's against the current CVS version, sorry for having forgotten to
point it out. Perhaps you've forgotten to run cvs update?
No. Must be
Greg Hurrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. Must be some other weirdness on my system. [...]
Maybe your mail client mangled the long lines in the patch? Try to
download the patch from here and see if it works then:
http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~hniksic/lfs-patch
