Re: -nv option; printing out infos via stderr[http://bugs.debian.org/141323]

2002-04-09 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Ian Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 5 Apr 2002 at 18:17, Noel Koethe wrote: Will this be changed so the user could use -nv with /dev/null and get only errors or warnings displayed? So what I think you want is for any log message tagged as LOG_VERBOSE (verbose information) or

Re: -nv option; printing out infos via stderr [http://bugs.debian.org/141323]

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Abbott
On 9 Apr 2002 at 10:34, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Ian Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 5 Apr 2002 at 18:17, Noel Koethe wrote: Will this be changed so the user could use -nv with /dev/null and get only errors or warnings displayed? So what I think you want is for any log message tagged

Re: -nv option; printing out infos via stderr [http://bugs.debian.org/141323]

2002-04-09 Thread Ian . Pellew
Guys For what its worth:- Most of my code logs to a level using something like command --verbose 10 .|| -v10 etc. In my code, I call a trace routine that simply checks the verbose level with the call level and log if it is -ge. EG:- // in

Re: -nv option; printing out infos via stderr [http://bugs.debian.org/141323]

2002-04-05 Thread Ian Abbott
On 5 Apr 2002 at 18:17, Noel Koethe wrote: Will this be changed so the user could use -nv with /dev/null and get only errors or warnings displayed? So what I think you want is for any log message tagged as LOG_VERBOSE (verbose information) or LOG_NONVERBOSE (basic information) in the source