Dave Yeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ps anyone getting a bunch of what look like viruses on the
wget-patches list?
I just noticed them on gmane. I've now asked the SunSITE.dk staff to
deploy the kind of virus/spam protection currently used by this list
(confirmation required for non-subscribers
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other function arguments control various formatting options. (Where
can't GCC printf() using %ll?)
For the record, GCC doesn't printf() anything, printf is defined in
the standard library. If the operating system's printf() doesn't
support %ll,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
The other function arguments control various formatting options. (Where
can't GCC printf() using %ll?)
For the record, GCC doesn't printf() anything, printf is defined in
the standard library. If the operating system's printf() doesn't
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but perhaps a better question would have been, 'Where can't a GCC
user do a printf() using %ll?'.
On any system that predates `long long'. For example, SunOS 4.1.x,
Ultrix, etc.
I thought we were discussing changes for large-file support.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:52:56 -0600 (CST), Steven M. Schweda wrote:
I don't claim that it's a perfect scheme, but it would probably pay
to look at the beta code for Zip 3.0 and/or UnZip 6.0 to see how these
things are done in a _very_ portable program. (Before doing something
even more lame.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven M. Schweda) writes:
From: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but perhaps a better question would have been, 'Where can't a GCC
user do a printf() using %ll?'.
On any system that predates `long long'. For example, SunOS 4.1.x,
Ultrix, etc.
I thought we were
Is the source for Zip 3.0/UnZip 6.0 publicaly available?
I believe that some relatively recent beta code (Zip 3.0d, UnZip
6.0b) is available under:
ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/OLD/beta/
and probably various mirrors around the world. You might wish to start
at
Steven and Hrvoje,
wget-1.9.1 has a function number_to_string which is in fact
a home-made equivalent to printf () %ld. In the LFS patch which
I submitted I made a sister-routine number_to_string_64 which
is equivalent to printf() %llu. Thus, wget does not rely on
%ll or %llu.
Leonid
16-FEB-2005
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
For the last several months I've been completely absent from Wget
development, and from the net in general. Here is why, and the story
is not for the faint of heart.
Glad you're back and hope your health is getting better.
The TODO list has grown a bit while you've been