Re: bit overflow in wget 1.9

2004-01-21 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >> Thanks for the report. Wget still doesn't handle large files (it doesn't >> use off_t yet). I plan to fix this for the next release. > > Speaking of this subject, I'm currently doing just about the same

Re: bit overflow in wget 1.9

2004-01-21 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Thanks for the report. Wget still doesn't handle large files (it doesn't > use off_t yet). I plan to fix this for the next release. Speaking of this subject, I'm currently doing just about the same in libcurl (adding large file support) and I thought

Re: bit overflow in wget 1.9

2004-01-21 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Thanks for the report. Wget still doesn't handle large files (it doesn't use off_t yet). I plan to fix this for the next release.

bit overflow in wget 1.9

2004-01-21 Thread Jamie Zawinski
The server says Content-Length: 7388868608 wget 1.9 says Length: -1,201,065,984 [application/octet-stream] Yeah, that's a 33 bit number, but my file system can handle it, so wget should be able to as well: -rw-r--r--1 jwz 7388868608 Jan 21 00:06 foo.tar.gz Also, it's cur