Re: errno patches for Windows

"Hrvoje Niksic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > #ifdef WINDOWS > # define select(a, b, c, d) windows_select (a, b, c, d) > #endif Okay by me. > #ifndef ENOTCONN > # define ENOTCONN X_ENOTCONN > #endif Except you cannot make Winsock return X_ENOTCONN. It returns WSAENOTCONN (def'ed to ENOTCONN in m

Re: errno patches for Windows

"Gisle Vanem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There is another possible approach. We already #define read and write >> to call Winsock stuff. We could add some more magic so that they and >> other Winsock invocations automatically set errno to last error value, >> translating Windows errors to er

Re: errno patches for Windows

"Hrvoje Niksic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > OK. So the whole thing with errno is only necessary when dealing with > Winsock errors. For errors from, say, fopen it's fine to use errno? Yes. > There is another possible approach. We already #define read and write > to call Winsock stuff. We co

Re: errno patches for Windows

[ Moving discussion from wget-patches to wget. ] "Gisle Vanem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm pretty sure that other GNU applications -- that have also been >> ported to Windows -- use errno. I wonder how they do it... > > Lynx uses this: > #define SOCKET_ERRNO errno > #ifdef WINDOWS >

Re: Wget 1.9 about to be released

"Tony Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >> I'm about to release 1.9 today, unless it takes more time to upload it >> to ftp.gnu.org. >> >> If there's a serious problem you'd like fixed in 1.9, speak up now or >> be silent until 1.9.1. :-) > > I thought we were going to

Re: Wget 1.9 about to be released

Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > I'm about to release 1.9 today, unless it takes more time to upload it > to ftp.gnu.org. > > If there's a serious problem you'd like fixed in 1.9, speak up now or > be silent until 1.9.1. :-) I thought we were going to turn our attention to 1.10. :-)

Problems with w2k in wget-1.9

First: the stupid errors (Winsock's fault) It is true that the winsock functions do not set errno, its actually pretty simple to grab the error code errno = WSAGetLastError(); this should suffice. Unfortunately, even if the error is set properly, strerror() will NOT give out the result. It'll

Wget 1.9-rc1 available for testing

As the name implies, this should be 1.9 (with only version changed) unless a show-stopper is discovered. Get it from: http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~hniksic/wget/wget-1.9-rc1.tar.gz

Wget 1.9 about to be released

I'm about to release 1.9 today, unless it takes more time to upload it to ftp.gnu.org. If there's a serious problem you'd like fixed in 1.9, speak up now or be silent until 1.9.1. :-)

Re: Problem recursive download

"Sergey Vasilevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think wget strong verify link syntax: > onMouseOut="img_off('main21')"> > That link have incorrect symbol ';' not quoted in . You are right. However, this has been fixed in Wget 1.9-beta, which will interpret the above as: In other word

Re: Problem recursive download

This seems to work in my copy of 1.8.2. Perhaps you have something in your .wgetrc that breaks things?

RE: Problem recursive download

I think wget strong verify link syntax: That link have incorrect symbol ';' not quoted in . > -Original Message- > From: Sergey Vasilevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Problem recursive download > > > I use wget 1

Problem recursive download

I use wget 1.8.2 Try recursive downdload www.map-by.info/index.html, but wget stop in first page. Why? index.html have links to another page. /usr/local/bin/wget -np -r -N -nH --referer=http://map-by.info -P /tmp/www.map-by.info -D map-by.info http://map-by.info http://www.map-by.info --10:09:25-