i submitted a patch in february.
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget%40sunsite.dk/msg04645.html
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/409/2003/2/100/10313375/
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Peschko, Edward wrote:
> Just upgraded to 1.8.2 and ok, I think I see the problem here...
>
> --spider only works with h
Just upgraded to 1.8.2 and ok, I think I see the problem here...
--spider only works with html files.. right? If so, why?
> Ed
hey,
I was wondering if wget planned or had the following features:
1) trying multiple urls - ie:
wget 'http://site1,http://site2,http://site3'
would try http://site1 to download, on failure try http://site2, on failure of that
try http://site3.
2) just testing the connection without dow
rrgh.
I see that you have an option '--spider' to just test the connection, however, it
doesn't seem to work unless you place the option *before* the url. ie:
wget --spider 'ftp://stuff'
works
wheras
wget --spider 'ftp://stuff2'
doesn't.
no - scratch that - it *doesn't* seem to work if be
Hi all!
My situation: a modem on an unlimited night dialup access.
About 4 people edit their url.txt files to post there files they want.
Then I use cron to divide 9.5 hours of online-time to download all
these files.
I faces with some problems and need for some features:
If there's a working cop
--- "Aaron S. Hawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how is your request different than --wait ?
>
I'm not in position to verify right now and it's been
a while since I really knew the ins and outs of wget.
But IIRC, --wait is only the time between getting
files and not the time between initial co
I use the --spider option a lot and don't have trouble with most sites.
When using the --spider option for the Mozilla website I get a 500 error
response. Without the --spider option I don't receive the problem. Any
guesses?
$ wget --debug --spider www.mozilla.org
DEBUG output created by Wget 1.
it's available in the CVS version..
information at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roman Dusek wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> thanks for WGet, it's a great tool. I would very appreciate one more
> option: a possibility to get http page using POST method instead of GET.
>
> Cheer
how is your request different than --wait ?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
> I'd like to request an additional (or modified) option
> that waits for whatever time specified by the user, no
> more no less (instead of the linear backoff of
> --waitretry which is just a slightly less obnoxi
Dear Sirs,
thanks for WGet, it's a great tool. I would very appreciate one more
option: a possibility to get http page using POST method instead of GET.
Cheers,
Roman
I'd like to request an additional (or modified) option
that waits for whatever time specified by the user, no
more no less (instead of the linear backoff of
--waitretry which is just a slightly less obnoxious
form of hammering). Looks like it would only take a
few lines of code but I can't figure
11 matches
Mail list logo
