Your details

2003-09-03 Thread msdn
Please see the attached file for details.

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Can you show me an example of a URL that failed to parse? > > > > the problem was not with false negatives, but with false positives > > instead. URLs like: > > > > http://[2001.23]/ > > ftp://[dead:beef:

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Outside Unix this is needlessly complex and completely unnecessary, > >> not to mention that it doesn't work outside a shell requirement. > >> Wget tries to help by allowing you to completely avoid Autoco

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Outside Unix this is needlessly complex and completely unnecessary, >> not to mention that it doesn't work outside a shell requirement. >> Wget tries to help by allowing you to completely avoid Autoconf and >> simply provide your own Makefile and conf

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > what about the patch for src/url.c? >> >> It looks fine, but I'm not sure I understand why it's necessary to >> install full IP address understanding at the URL parsing level. > > please, take a look at RFC 2732. it is just 6 pages long and it is >

Re: --disable-dns-cache

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > That contradicts Hrvoje, and really doesn't make sense. > > Jeremy *should* write a properly formatted ChangeLog. As author of his > changes, he is the best person to summarize exactly what they do. Why not do > so in the standard form of a ChangeLog entry?

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I almost can't believe this is serious -- ansi2knr and the PARAMS > >> macro are concession enough to pre-ANSI compilers; I wouldn't want to > >> encumber the program with the K&R-style function definitio

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Bauhaus) writes: > > > Hrvoje Niksic, Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:58:02 +0200: > >> Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> 2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget? > >> > > >> > it makes the sources

Re: --disable-dns-cache

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Jeremy Reeve wrote: > > > >> I've written a trivial patch to implement the --disable-dns-cache feature > >> as described in the TODO contained in the CVS tree. I need to write the > >>

Re: autoconf 2.5x and automake support for wget 1.9 beta

2003-09-03 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Hrvoje Niksic, Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:58:02 +0200: > > Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >> 2. Care to elaborate on why you introduced automake in wget? > > > > > > it makes the sources __MUCH__ easier to maintain, believe me. > > > > How