> "Daniel" == Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On 14 Apr 2002, Karsten Thygesen wrote:
>> Anyway - spamassassin is now in place - let's give it a chance
>> before doing radical movements - and I can assure, that ezmlm is
>> far more mature and stable than Mailman - we (
On 14 Apr 2002, Karsten Thygesen wrote:
> Anyway - spamassassin is now in place - let's give it a chance before doing
> radical movements - and I can assure, that ezmlm is far more mature and
> stable than Mailman - we (sunsite) have been running both systems for
> years, and there is no doubt ab
> "Daniel" == Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andre Majorel wrote:
>> > The moderators are informed about each message that awaits >
>> moderation; that alert would contain a URL they can visit and >
>> approve or reject the mail, at their discreti
> "Alan" == Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> On Saturday 13 April 2002 23:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>> 2. Plug the "filter" script between the local mail delivery agent
>> and Mailman. The filter can add an `X-Moderate-Me-Please' header
>> to the mails that fail the filtering rul
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The web interface is not necessary. Listar, for instance, just
>> forwards the dubious mails to the moderator. Approving the message
>> is done by replying to listar (actually forwarding to
>> somelist-repost@somedomain, but you get the idea).
>
> Th
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andre Majorel wrote:
> >The moderators are informed about each message that awaits
> >moderation; that alert would contain a URL they can visit and
> >approve or reject the mail, at their discretion.
>
> The web interface is not necessary. Listar, for instance, ju
On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 10:49, Andre Majorel wrote:
> The web interface is not necessary. Listar, for instance, just
> forwards the dubious mails to the moderator. Approving the
> message is done by replying to listar (actually forwarding to
> somelist-repost@somedomain, but you get the idea).
Accor
On 2002-04-14 05:00 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>The moderators are informed about each message that awaits
>moderation; that alert would contain a URL they can visit and
>approve or reject the mail, at their discretion.
The web interface is not necessary. Listar, for instance, just
On Sunday 14 April 2002 01:23, you wrote:
> Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Does it allow custom rules, such as bonus points for mails that
> mention "wget" or "debug log" in the body?
AFAIK, yes. you can put your rules in the local configuration file.
--
AlanE
Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 13 April 2002 23:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>>
>> 2. Plug the "filter" script between the local mail delivery agent and
>>Mailman. The filter can add an `X-Moderate-Me-Please' header to
>>the mails that fail the filtering rules. I can imple
On Saturday 13 April 2002 23:00, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
> 2. Plug the "filter" script between the local mail delivery agent and
>Mailman. The filter can add an `X-Moderate-Me-Please' header to
>the mails that fail the filtering rules. I can implement the
>filter.
I'm using Mail::Spa
This is the proposal I sent to the administrators at sunsite.dk
yesterday. I haven't received a response from the admins yet.
The mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has been receiving inordinate
amounts of spam. Even I, who am used to receiving (and dismissing) a
lot of spam, am dismayed at and
12 matches
Mail list logo
