On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Peter Karlsson wrote:
I don't think forbidding BOCU-1 is a good idea. If there is ever a
proper specification written of it, it could be very useful as a
compression format for documents.
BOCU-1 has been used for security attacks. It's on the no fly list.
Do
At 10:16 +1000 25/06/07, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
Thanks Maciej for summarising Apple's position so nicely.
I think it's good that you have spelled it out:
Apple is happy to support MPEG-4, which has known patent encumberance
and unknown submarine patents, while Apple is not happy to support
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
What about the Gecko entity parsing extension?
- IE consitently parses unterminated entities from latin-1
- Gecko parses all unterminated entities, even those beyond latin-1, but only
in text-content, not in attributes. (seems my recent
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Sam Ruby wrote:
With the latest changes to html5lib, we get a failure on a test named
test_title_body_named_charref.
Before, A mdash B == A — B, now A mdash B == A amp;mdash B.
Is that what we really want? Testing with Firefox, the old behavior is
preferable.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
Personally, I would prefer something along these lines:
I. All entities are created equal (the burden of carrying a semicolon
shall be equally distributed amongst all).
For authors, this is now the case.
For implementations, we are pretty
On Monday 25 June 2007 09:19, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
What about the Gecko entity parsing extension?
- IE consitently parses unterminated entities from latin-1
- Gecko parses all unterminated entities, even those beyond latin-1, but
only in
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
In Konqueror, we support both, and it appears by my little test that
Firefox 2 does the same now.
- In attributes all unclosed latin-1 tags are accepted.
- In text-content ALL unclosed tags are accepted.
A little inconsistent, but I
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
This has
been discussed to death already, but here are our basic reasons:
- MPEG-4 is an ISO open standard (although unfortunately
patent-encumbered).
No-one is telling you not to support MPEG-4.
- H.264 offers considerably better quality at the same bitrate than
Dave Singer wrote:
What is more, no-one with
deep pockets has yet used the Ogg codecs seriously, and therefore there
is no honey pot to attract the submarines (hm, do submarines like
honey?). This is not the case with H.264 and AAC, as we have made, um,
some money using them, among others.
If there is a character set that sports both, it must be used to put down
some human language. My point there is no language that could make use of
this distinction by having both uuml; and utrema;. There are languages
that use uuml; and theoretically there could be ones that use utrema;,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:47:57 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://simon.html5.org/test/html/parsing/entities/trailing-semicolon/
[...] I might create proper test cases on this later when this is
specced.
Done:
Inconsistently, as of IE7: I got ge verbatim from your test.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 2:55 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing
What about
A stressed schwa is present in Polish maritime dialect as well (Kaszëbszczi)
and Slovaks write mäso for miaso (meat), but that is not the point. All
such uses can be covered under the hood of the dieresis; I only want the
true umlaut to be distinct, not as a code point but as an entity name.
Hi Dave,
On 6/25/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:16 +1000 25/06/07, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
Thanks Maciej for summarising Apple's position so nicely.
I think it's good that you have spelled it out:
Apple is happy to support MPEG-4, which has known patent encumberance
and
According to Wikipedia,
ATT is trying to sue companies such as Apple Inc. over alleged
MPEG-4 patent infringement.[1][2][3]
I would be fascinated to see a statement from Apple, Inc. regarding this.
It's also quite interesting that different portions of MPEG-4,
including different sections of
On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:44AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
A stressed schwa is present in Polish maritime dialect as well (Kaszëbszczi)
and Slovaks write mäso for miaso (meat), but that is not the point. All
such uses can be covered under the hood of the dieresis;
I really do not understand why
Dave Singer schrieb:
At 10:16 +1000 25/06/07, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
can I insert the same phrase you used and unknown submarine patents?
Otherwise you mis-characterize the position. What is more, no-one with
deep pockets has yet used the Ogg codecs seriously, and therefore there
is no
On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:57AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
Inconsistently, as of IE7: I got ge verbatim from your test.
ge; is /not/ a latin-1 entity.
--
Øistein E. Andersen
On 25 Jun 2007, at 13:21, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
According to Wikipedia,
ATT is trying to sue companies such as Apple Inc. over alleged
MPEG-4 patent infringement.[1][2][3]
I would be fascinated to see a statement from Apple, Inc. regarding
this.
Seeming they are already under risk
At 13:21 +0100 25/06/07, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
According to Wikipedia,
ATT is trying to sue companies such as Apple Inc. over alleged
MPEG-4 patent infringement.[1][2][3]
I would be fascinated to see a statement from Apple, Inc. regarding this.
I regret that we (like most companies)
Hello,
On 6/25/07, Maik Merten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If Safari is encountering application/ogg and it can't decode that
stuff then redirect (after asking of course) the user to a fitting
QuickTime component download page on e.g. xiph.org or even automate the
process of installing a
Silvia Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need to encode as a java applet - all you need to do is put the
java applet on the server together with your Ogg Theora content. And -
by all means - this is not supposed to be an end solution, but just a
fix to bridge the gap until all Browsers support
Křištof Želechovski schreef:
Could I have an example of otrema; please? Something along the lines of
zoölogy, but actually required? Not that I doubt your knowledge of Dutch
but I would like to have it as a demonstration.
Chris
coördinaten
BTW: neither of the quotes below are mine ;-)
Forgive my intruston, as I have been a lurker on this discussion for some
months, and some of the discussion often goes over my head. This may have
been proposed (if it has, I apologize for wasting your time), and perhaps I
do not fully appreciate the implications - but perhaps a solution would
Øistein E. Andersen schreef:
French dictionaries require loan-words like angström, führer and länder (plural
of land) to be spelt with an umlaut, but these are of course too rare for
a differentiation tréma/umlaut to have developed, and I would imagine
German imports with umlaut to be only
I've tried to figure out which elements are filtered for when getting the
various collection attributes.
http://simon.html5.org/test/html/dom/htmlcollections/
(I've emailed about 001..006 before, this email is about 007..019.)
Below is what doesn't work as currently specced.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
If there is a character set that sports both, it must be used to put
down some human language. My point there is no language that could make
use of this distinction by having both uuml; and utrema;. There are
languages that use uuml; and
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:44AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
A stressed schwa is present in Polish maritime dialect as well
(Kaszëbszczi) and Slovaks write mäso for miaso (meat), but that
is not the point. All such uses can be covered under
So a company which owns a patent on a standard that can bought and
read at freedom is just as bad as a company which owns a patent on a
standard that has absolutely no public documentation?
If you're talking about Ogg Theora, then you've got your facts wrong.
First of all, Ogg Theora is not
On 25 Jun 2007, at 8:28AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
HTML5 currently follows IE7 much more closely than Safari,
Firefox and Opera do, which seems to suggest that some of the quirks
could be dispensed with.
It's possible, though people kept pointing
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
I am looking forward to seeing more extensive research on this.
The informal research I did when updating the spec suggests that the
current state of the spec is what is better. I don't really know how to do
more research -- it's quite hard to
On 6/25/07, Spartanicus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main worry relates to the usability and accessibility of future audio
and video web content. Content including the wrapping should be free,
you don't quite mean that. if a content producer wants to make pay
content, it should be free to do
Hello,
(Sorry if this gets posted twice.)
On 6/25/07, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/07, Spartanicus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main worry relates to the usability and accessibility of future audio
and video web content. Content including the wrapping should be free,
you don't
33 matches
Mail list logo
