On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
1. The specification defines the term script source to mean
either the text or the infoset, depending whether the script is
text-based or XML-based. What is the script
For future reference, I posted another suggestion to the public-webapps
list. Instead of specifying a download URL, you could specify a URL on a
type as the source of the data:
dataTransfer.setRemoteData(mimeType, url);
That could allow for both file downloads and/or lazy loading of data
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
To me, getStorageUpdates seems to imply that updates have
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Mike Wilsonmike...@hotmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean. The ideal thing would be if we
could implement path-based security with the same
construct that adds path-based namespacing.
I realize the problem of backwards-compat, but have
there been any efforts
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:29:55 +0200, Adam Barth wha...@adambarth.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Mike Wilsonmike...@hotmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean. The ideal thing would be if we
could implement path-based security with the same
construct that adds path-based namespacing.
2009/8/27 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
Things missing from Arun's File proposal as is, off the top of my head:
a) a directory structure (someone would have to build one on top of it...
not critical, but not ideal)
b) Ability to store it not in localStorage in some hidden directory,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
From a practical perspective it would be nice to have an unambiguous way
to mark up numerical constants in a document and thus allow a
straightforward way of doing conversions.
Personally, the obvious use case for me is recipes.
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I'm not aware of any UAs implementing an XML-based scripting language,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms766512%28VS.85%29.aspx
Now you are.
That's not an XML-based scripting language. That's XML data islands, which
are declarative and
Adam Barth wrote:
Mike Wilsonmike...@hotmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean. The ideal thing would be if we
could implement path-based security with the same
construct that adds path-based namespacing.
I realize the problem of backwards-compat, but have
there been any efforts or
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:41:02 +0200, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com
wrote:
But maybe there has been previous efforts done on this
topic?
Besides that I think that this is not possible and will not be done, why
should we do it? If you want to be secure use a separate domain. If you
offer
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Mike Wilsonmike...@hotmail.com wrote:
- this mechanism needs a way to specify the blessed path,
maybe something along the lines of document.domain or a
response header
1) Document.domain is an abomination. We certainly don't want more
features like that.
2)
Adam Barth wrote:
Mike Wilsonmike...@hotmail.com wrote:
- this mechanism needs a way to specify the blessed path,
maybe something along the lines of document.domain or a
response header
1) Document.domain is an abomination. We certainly don't want more
features like that.
2)
Michael Nordman wrote:
And to confound the problem further, UAs dont have meta-data on hand with
which to relate various pieces of local data together and attribute them to
a specific user-identifiable 'application'. Everything is bound to a
security-origin, but that doesn't clearly identify or
On Aug 28, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ah, now I follow what you are requesting. Basically the ability to not
just hook into some virtual directory of files, but rather the normal
file tree as seen by the user on the Desktop/Documents folder/Images
folder/etc. And with that, not
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Lastly, is navigator.getStorageUpdates() the right name for the function
that drops the lock? Why was it changed from navigator.releaseLock()? I
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
You need a better font.
Well, it's the default Ubuntu sans-serif font, I think. I guess I'm
better off than the people viewing in IE6. :)
Is The user agent stops fetching the media data before it is completely
downloaded
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Broader note: loading and then modifying existing
documents in the browser might be cool. But in
general, I don't see the win of making the file
manager the tool to manage data created by web
apps. File managers are not really that great an
interface for
Can anyone from Firefox speak to whether this should be considered a bug
(I'm happy to file) or whether this behavior is intended?
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 22:54, Darin Fisher wrote:
Firefox and IE implement window modal, which
On Aug 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
Would you hold a different opinion for different types of HTML5-based
applications (like the TiddlyWiki app that gets copied locally)? Or
would you require that all apps go through an install process that
acquires quota, permissions, etc.?
Right, trying to answer on-topic ;-)
I guess if the spec doesn't mention anything about where
localStorage is persisted, it leaves it up to every browser
to decide whether to ask the user or use a default
location. Earlier I didn't think of the possibility of
localStorage data being stored in
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Brady Eidson wrote:
I would *NOT* be on board with the spec requiring anything about where the
file goes on the filesystem. I have never been convinced by the argument
that users always need
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Drew Wilson wrote:
Following up on this issue:
Currently, the checks specified for MessagePort.postMessage() are different
from the checks done in window.postMessage() (as described in section 7.2.4
Posting messages with message ports).
In particular, step 4 of section
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
Can anyone from Firefox speak to whether this should be considered a bug
(I'm happy to file) or whether this behavior is intended?
I'd say it's a bug. However I'm not sure that fixing it is high
priority. At least not
I'm saying that we should differentiate between the closed state and
cloned state.
Implementors effectively need to do this anyway, because the spec says that
closed ports are still task sources, while cloned ports are not.
It makes sense to be able to post closed ports via postmessage() because
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Kevin Benson kevin.m.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Lastly, is navigator.getStorageUpdates() the right name for the
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote:
4.4.3 The nav element
that are targetted at users
S//targeted//targetted// - - (typo)
Fixed.
4.8.1 The figure element
img src=promblem-packed-action.png alt=ROUGH COPY!
Promblem-Packed Action!
S//problem//promblem// - - (typo)
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote:
4.10.4.1.17 Radio Button state
Either neither a nor b have a form owner, or they both have one and
it is the same for both.
S//Either a and b both have no form owner//Either neither a
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Bensonkevin.m.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote:
4.10.4.1.17 Radio Button state
Either neither a nor b have a form owner, or they both have one and
it is the
SUMMARY
There currently is no way to detect the system idle state in the browser.
This makes it difficult to deal with any sort of chat room or instant
messaging client inside the browser since the idle will always be incorrect.
USE CASE
Any instant messaging client, or any client that requires
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:47 PM, David Bennettd...@google.com wrote:
SUMMARY
There currently is no way to detect the system idle state in the browser.
This makes it difficult to deal with any sort of chat room or instant
messaging client inside the browser since the idle will always be
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Bennettd...@google.com wrote:
SUMMARY
There currently is no way to detect the system idle state in the browser.
This makes it difficult to deal with any sort of chat room or instant
messaging client inside the browser since the idle will always be
On Aug 28, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Seems like an event would be a better solution. For example fire a
'idlestatechange' event with the following API:
Such an event implies one specific time interval that denotes 'idle'.
Different clients are likely to want to use different
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jens Alfkes...@google.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Seems like an event would be a better solution. For example fire a
'idlestatechange' event with the following API:
Such an event implies one specific time interval that
As far as I can tell, vertical tab ('\v') is not defined as a space
character anymore, but does not cause a parse error either (unlike
other control characters). Is this intentional?
In IE7, IE8 and Safari, '\v' is handled as a space character in the
sense that it can be used to separate
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
img explicitly says The img element must be empty. in the prose.
Same for br. This isn't done for the base, link, meta, hr,
embed, param, area, col and event-source. (I suppose there
might be others if I skipped one.)
Fixed (they all rely on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Some element content model explicitly mention that they can't contain
themself. This probably makes sense for the following elements as well:
* meter
* progress
* time
* t
* m
* abbr?
* cite?
There might be more.
Done for meter,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote:
4.10.4.1.17 Radio Button state
Either neither a nor b have a form owner, or they both have one and
it is the same for both.
S//Either a and b both have no form owner//Either neither a nor b
have
a form
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Gavin Sharp wrote:
(I searched the WHATWG and public-html mailing list archives to see
whether this issue had already been brought up, and couldn't find any
related discussion. Apologies if this has already been discussed.)
The current HTML 5 draft says:
The DOM
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Rob Kroeger wrote:
From http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/:
The openDatabase() method on the Window and WorkerUtils interfaces must
return a newly constructed Database object that represents the database
requested.
The spec does not make it clear what the UA on
39 matches
Mail list logo
