On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Mike Wilson<[email protected]> wrote: > I see what you mean. The ideal thing would be if we > could implement path-based security with the same > construct that adds path-based namespacing. > > I realize the problem of backwards-compat, but have > there been any efforts or definitive conclusions made > in this area?
I suspect the scheme+host+port model is too entrenched at this point to add +path to the origin tuple. Adam
