On 9/24/10, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:12 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
So, to improve the user experience while using web forms we would like
to fix that. However, we are wondering if :invalid (and :valid?)
specifications should be updated to take UX considerations or if a
On 26.09.2010 12:39, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to bring this back to attention.
I don't want this to be forgotten before anybody who is official
has said their definitive yes or no about it.
Or how else do new additions find their way into the draft?
Many were positive
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote:
I'd like to bring this back to attention.
I don't want this to be forgotten before anybody who is official has
said their definitive yes or no about it.
This thread has in fact already received an official reply:
This thread has in fact already received an official reply:
I am sorry, I didn't recognize you were one of the managers here.
I should've read more.
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028148.html
That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, den...@efjot.de wrote:
That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every
e-mail sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All
pending e-mails are tracked here:
http://www.whatwg.org/issues/
Alright, but I didn't see the answer
[Originally mailed to whatwg on Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:24:49 -0400,
but blocked from the list due to subscription troubles]
In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
element is a foreign element, then there may
On 9/26/10 4:12 PM, William F Hammond wrote:
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat p/
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that p/ can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
Sites rely on
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat p/
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that p/ can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
Sites unfortunately do things like that so we cannot
* William F Hammond wrote:
Does anyone seriously think that foo/ is an ordinary open tag?
They do if it's like in `a href=http://example.org/`.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
Question, whether html5 spec is specific about behavior for steps at...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197709#c0
See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197709#c3
I dont see HTML5 is specific about it at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#dom-open
10 matches
Mail list logo
