Riveting tale, chap. Can you provide proof?
Actually the burden of proof is on those who think that blockquote
has
some useful support.
No, that's not how burden of proof works. You made a claim regarding
blockquote, nils asked for proof. The onus is on you.
Thanks,
Ash
2012-02-12 8:36, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
Since in current usage, blockquote means just “indent” more often
than not, browsers and search engines should not and will not imply
any specific semantics for it. Thus it will be pointless to use it.
Riveting tale, chap. Can you provide proof?
Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi schrieb am Sun, 12 Feb 2012
12:04:13 +0200:
2012-02-12 8:36, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
Since in current usage, blockquote means just “indent” more
often than not, browsers and search engines should not and will
not imply any specific semantics for
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
bhawkesle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Doesn't the spec imply it should?
That depends on whom you ask. I would think that it does, but since it
doesn’t explicitly say to parse alternative text for replaced
elements, implementors could simply
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-02-12 2:13, Ian Hickson wrote:
That's not to say that one day we won't provide an explicit way to
mark up attribution for blockquotes in markup, just that the desired
presentation isn't a relevant concern in doing so
The relationship
2012-02-12 19:54, Ian Hickson wrote:
The blockquote has been, and will be, rather pointless without markup
for “credits” (indication of author and source, which are normally
required by law).
What's the use case, other than presentation?
What’s the use case for markup for quotations in
Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi schrieb am Sun, 12 Feb 2012
20:19:02 +0200:
[…]
The difference between blockquote and (for example) quotation as
quotation markup is that the latter has no burden of existing use for
other purposes.
By analogy, a completely new table element would also
2012-02-12 21:43, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
The difference between blockquote and (for example) quotation as
quotation markup is that the latter has no burden of existing use for
other purposes.
By analogy, a completely new table element would also be necessary.
There has been quite a
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-02-12 19:54, Ian Hickson wrote:
The blockquote has been, and will be, rather pointless without
markup for “credits” (indication of author and source, which are
normally required by law).
What's the use case, other than
2012-02-12 23:25, Ian Hickson wrote:
The use case for most of the semantic markup is jsut easier authoring
and maintenance, in particular for selectors in CSS.
If that’s the approach, and this reflects a consensus, shouldn’t this be
explained in the introductory material (which is now rather
I was wondering what were the patterns of quotes Web sites.
Searching for quotes in DuckDuckGo and taking them one by one.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=quotes
Not exhaustive, but done a few. It is… :) well see by yourself.
# The Quotations page
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/34200.html
On Friday 2012-02-10 10:37 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
I agree that having the list for lengths reduces the scope of the
problem somewhat. But the color quirk means that any shorthand that
includes colors will run into ambiguity issues if any keywords for
any subproperty only use letters in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-02-12 23:25, Ian Hickson wrote:
The use case for most of the semantic markup is just easier
authoring and maintenance, in particular for selectors in CSS.
If that’s the approach, and this reflects a consensus, shouldn’t
this be explained
We would like to present an authoring difficulty with regard to showing
images on the Web with limited bandwidth, when deferring loading of certain
or all images are preferable. We have some vague ideas about what
browser/markup solutions instead of script solutions might look like, but
we are
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:44:22 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Henri Sivonen wrote:
I believe I was implementing exactly what the spec said at the time I
implemented that behavior of Validator.nu. I'm particularly convinced
that I was following the spec, because I
15 matches
Mail list logo
