Re: [whatwg] Canvas Path.addPath SVGMatrix not optimal?

2014-03-19 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Mar 19, 2014, at 10:48 PM, "Rik Cabanier" mailto:caban...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad mailto:ju...@google.com>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze mailto:dschu...@adobe.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > I just looked at the definition of Pa

Re: [whatwg] Support filters in Canvas

2014-03-19 Thread Rik Cabanier
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > Hi, > > Apologize if it was already discussed but I couldn't find a mail to this > topic. > Yes, this was brought up a couple of times. Last exchange was in Sept of 2012 (!): http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-Septembe

Re: [whatwg] Canvas Path.addPath SVGMatrix not optimal?

2014-03-19 Thread Rik Cabanier
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]: > > > > void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation); > > > > SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted

Re: [whatwg] Canvas Path.addPath SVGMatrix not optimal?

2014-03-19 Thread Justin Novosad
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > Hi, > > I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]: > > void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation); > > SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it > optional as well? I think it should be optio

[whatwg] Canvas Path.addPath SVGMatrix not optimal?

2014-03-19 Thread Dirk Schulze
Hi, I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]: void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation); SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it optional as well? I think it should be optional, especially because creating an SVGMatrix at the moment means

[whatwg] Canvas Path.addPath SVGMatrix not optimal?

2014-03-19 Thread Dirk Schulze
Hi, I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]: void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation); SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it optional as well? I think it should be optional, especially because creating an SVGMatrix at the moment means

Re: [whatwg] inverse property mechanism for Microdata?

2014-03-19 Thread Dan Brickley
On 17 March 2014 21:15, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> We discussed this (and the -inv suggestion) at schema.org again, and the >> consensus there was that we'd like to have the search engines proceed >> with accepting an experimental/proposed 'inverse itemprop