On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
the diagnostic
)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
--
Adam de Boor
Google
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Michael Kozakewich wrote:
How many applications do we expect any one user to have open? I would
imagine one would do fine on the Taskbar or in the Notification Area,
like other programs, but a manager would be good if a user had a great
deal of applications running at
2009/7/28 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
The only concern I see with this is that it permanently forces all
windows from the same domain to run in the same process. As things
stand today, if the user opens two tabs (or windows) and navigates to
the two different pages on www.example.com,
could the botnet concern be addressed by restricting network access from the
background page when there is no foreground page referencing it? e.g.
restrict it to requests to the same origin, no matter how those requests are
made? wouldn't let gmail precache linked images, when fetching new mail,
the difficulty with a named-section option is that the manifest generation
for an application would have to know which users use a particular machine,
which is pretty much a non-starter.
a
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
If the application code (HTML, JS, CSS)
/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
--
Adam de Boor
Google
I guess in the double-AppCache model, where there's a generic cached
redirect page, one could make it so all user-specific accesses use a URL
with a user-specific prefix, so it can prefix-match against an entry in the
NETWORK section of the generic cached app manifest.
still, given how many apps
