Re: [whatwg] [CSS3-text] Proposal: text-shadow enhancements

2008-10-26 Thread J. King
-shadow to a lesser extent? Also, I'd think that shipped and shipping implementations would be a deterrant to extending the syntax now, not a reason for it. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] video tag javascript library for contemporary browsers

2008-10-15 Thread J. King
it. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] Some video questions

2008-01-30 Thread J. King
complicating things by talking about Silverlight, here. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] Target Attribute Values

2007-04-28 Thread J. King
window.open() as well. open_newwindow=1 -suppressing- new windows? Holy counterintuitive, Batman! Or is that just a typo on your part? -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] Video proposals

2007-03-16 Thread J. King
, presumably. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] finding a number...

2006-12-13 Thread J. King
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:13:10 -0500, Mikko Rantalainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would fail for numbers such as 1,234,456.789,012 1.234.456,789.012 but that such formats used in any locale? It would also fail for integers, which are bound to be very common. -- J. King http://jking.dark

[whatwg] [WebApps] html start tag token in main phase

2006-12-08 Thread J. King
. Wouldn't it be simpler to just properly process the html start tag in the root element phase instead of having such a special case? I'm certainly finding this special case to be needlessly difficult to deal with. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] Provding Better Tools

2006-12-03 Thread J. King
not anywhere near finished yet, but the parser so far goes through the whole document and spits out the appropriate tokens; I just haven't done anything with said tokens yet, mainly because I was discouraged by PHP's DOM implementation. My parser is also slow as molasses, unfortunately. -- J

Re: [whatwg] Provding Better Tools

2006-12-03 Thread J. King
a parser implemented in C and available through every standard installation of PHP. It could be used by other languages too. I am keeping my fingers crossed, hoping that someone much more knowledgable than I will do this. :) -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

[whatwg] [WebApps] Parsing: Attribute name state

2006-07-19 Thread J. King
The spec doesn't say whether duplicate attributes produce parse errors. For clarity's sake it might be a good idea to state this explicitly. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] [WebApps] Parsing: bogus DOCTYPE state

2006-07-18 Thread J. King
of the tree builder yet. Still, I will concede that these are in the realm of edge cases probably not worth worrying about; forget I said anything. :) -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

[whatwg] [WebApps] Parsing: bogus DOCTYPE state

2006-07-17 Thread J. King
of DOCTYPEs is necessary. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

[whatwg] [WebApps] Parsing: close tag open state

2006-07-16 Thread J. King
character tokens and switch to the data state? -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

[whatwg] [WebApps] Entity consumption

2006-07-14 Thread J. King
. It isn't quite clear from this what constitutes a consumable character in this context. When looking at the table it's reasonably obvious that the range is [A-Za-z], but it might be helpful to have it stated in the main text. -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/

Re: [whatwg] [WebApps] Entity consumption

2006-07-14 Thread J. King
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:53:31 -0400, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, J. King wrote: There are two paragraphs at the end of section 8.2.1.1: # When an end tag token is emitted, the content model # flag must be switched to the PCDATA state. # # When an end tag

Re: [whatwg] [wf2] repeat-min and max

2006-04-07 Thread J. King
meant for positive to include zero. Still, whether 0 is a valid value or not is moot: invalid values are assumed to be zero, so it all functionally adds up to the same thing. I suppose stating that the value must be a non-negative integer would be more precise. -- J. King http://jking.dark

Re: [whatwg] [wf2] repeat-min and max

2006-04-07 Thread J. King
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:44:44 -0300, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 7, 2006, at 17:16, J. King wrote: Still, whether 0 is a valid value or not is moot: invalid values are assumed to be zero, so it all functionally adds up to the same thing. It is moot for browsers. It isn't

Re: [whatwg] [web-apps] 2.7.8 The i element

2005-04-16 Thread J. King
on. :) -- J. King http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/