On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:36:38 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:27:30 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
>>> wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:27:30 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am staring at the @width and @height attributes of the
>> element, because I have just noticed that the implementation of
Hi all,
I am staring at the @width and @height attributes of the
element, because I have just noticed that the implementation of IE9
doesn't respect percentage values in there. I remembered Hixie saying
that if you gave them a value that included "px", that's strictly
speaking not valid, since th
Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:49:00 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>>>
>&
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:49:00 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
>>> wrote
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> I would expect a style of rendering where all words are first
>> displayed in ordinary display and e.g. painted in a different color as
>> the time reac
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:09:24 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
> wrote:
>
>>> Using is a bad idea since the WebSRT syntax already uses -->. I
>>> don't see the need for multiline comments.
>>
>> Right. If we must have comments I think I'd prefer /*
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:21:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> Since the attributes in are a hint, probably what is available
>> in the file should overrule what is in the attributes. It is
>> the same for th
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:35:50 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters
>>&
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Odin Omdal Hørthe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> [...] You're also excluding roll-on captions then which is a feature of
>>> live broadcasting.
>>
>> It isn't clear to me that an external file would be a good solution for
>> live b
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:30:03 +0200, Simon Pieters wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The point of a header is that browsers can identify WebSRT files and not
>>> keep parsing through a 100
I've just looked into using WebSRT for subtitling songs where I'm also
using it to provide more detailed timing on the individual words
within the cue. This can obviously used for Karaoke-style display, but
is also very educational for learning the lyrics to a song or even for
a deaf person to foll
On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, "Philip Jägenstedt" wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:37:06 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer <
>&g
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:37:06 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Styling hooks were reques
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>
> Styling hooks were requested. If we only have the predefined tags (i, b,
> ...) and voices, these will most certainly be abused, e.g. resulting in
> being used where italics isn't wanted or being used just for
> styling, breaking the
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Chris Double wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> >> Removing the poster attribute is an option to turn the poster off but
> >> there is no way to turn it back on again.
> >
> > You just need
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Chris Double wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Shiv Kumar
> wrote:
> >
> > No, this won’t work. I don’t want the poster to be shown during a seek so
> > the question of showing it until seek completes is moot.
>
> I think Chris meant that the poster should
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> >I've also stated that I believe that the poster should indeed be
> displayed when the video element is just loaded and not on autoplay. And I
> have agreed that >there should be a possibility to have that state return
> after the video has pl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> Silvia,
>
>
>
> I don’t believe you’ve given is a good reason and use case for not having a
> single method the allows turning on and off the poster without any side
> effects.
>
>
>
> >I haven't seen a case yet that speaks for having this fea
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> >For the pause state you will have to use the onpause event to make any
> changes. But to be honest, I doubt anyone would want to show the poster in
> >pause state. I have not >seen that anywhere yet and I have come across a
> sizeable number
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> Silvia,
>
>
>
> How do you supposed the case I mentioned earlier (where when the video is
> paused the poster is shown) will work with load()?
>
For the pause state you will have to use the onpause event to make any
changes. But to be honest,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Chris Pearce wrote:
> On 21/09/2010 2:37 p.m., Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
>
>The only thing that remains then is if web developers would like
>> control over the poster, such as to show the poster after th
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> Rob,
>
>
>
> >Do you have use-cases where calling "load()" after the video stream ends
> would not be a reasonable solution?
>
> As you can imagine, getting an Html 5 video player to work as expected is
> a delicate balance, especially when h
'both', which denote when the poster is
> shown? Or the values could be enumerated similar to how readyState and
> networkState are enumerated.
>
>
> On 20/09/2010 7:57 p.m., Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
>
>> >Co
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> >Could a call to video.load() reset this state?
>
> Currently is doesn’t affect the poster. But would that be intuitive? I’m
> getting the video element to load it’s source and so the poster will show?
>
>
>
> Ideally poster should be an obje
Could a call to video.load() reset this state?
Silvia.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> As regards having more control of the poster’s visibility, what I’m
> saying is that one should have the ability to turn on/off a poster.
> Currently once the poster has been made invi
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Shiv Kumar wrote:
> I’d like to see the implementation of the poster attribute change to
> something that is more useful. By useful I mean something that wroks without
> the need for javascript and works the way most people would expect.
>
>
>
> Currently the pos
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:09 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:48 +0200
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:48 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:08:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan
>> wrote:
>> > I think an ideal API for video frame processing would involve handing
>> video
>> > frames to a Worker for pro
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
> On 2010-09-09 09:24, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:15:27 +0200, David Singer
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:13 PM, And Clover wrote:
> Perhaps I *meant* to serve a non-video
> file with some
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju wrote:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
> >> > Firefox
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:08:43 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>>
>>> If
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Biju wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571822
> > Firefox fires the timeupdate event once per frame.
> > Safari 5 and Chrome 6 fire every 250ms. Opera 10.50 fires every 200ms.
>
>
> Now in firefox bug 571822 they are changing Firefox fires the
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
> >
> >> Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers.
> There have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuf
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 9/1/10 9:13 AM, Brian Campbell wrote:
>
>> It seems that periodically, web standards bodies decide "this time, if
>> we're strict, people will just get the content right or it won't work" (such
>> as XHTML with XML parsing rules), and inv
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to
> > see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > However, what exactly happens with a media fragment URI like
> > > > http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 is not fully
> >
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:39:00 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>>
> The question, then, is if parser
sibly be changed in
JavaScript and checking which effects they have in all browsers, i.e. what
events they call etc. I wasn't aware that authors are discouraged from
changing @src on .
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:16:56 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:32:21 +0200
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:32:21 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> Aside: WebSRT can't con
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2010, at 18:01, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > I developed WMML as a xml-based caption format that will not have the
> problems that have been pointed out for DFXP/TTML, namely: there are no
> namespaces, it does
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Eric Carlson wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Eric Carlson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > * Whet
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:32:49 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:42:04 +0200
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
nils-dagsson-mosk...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> Silvia Pfeiffer schrieb am Sat, 21 Aug 2010
> 16:28:07 +1000:
>
> > Another example is a Web page that has music playing back as constant
> > background,
Sorry, forget about this question.
I have managed to get it working after all.
Apologies,
Silvia.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried to work with the globalCompositeOperation [1] over the last days
> for a particular use case where I
Hi all,
I've tried to work with the globalCompositeOperation [1] over the last days
for a particular use case where I am trying to use a gradient to merge with
a canvas as a mask. I now wonder if the globalCompositeOperation is indeed
meant to be used this way and what transparency means.
For exa
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> >
>> > That requires editing the resource. Think about it from a process
>>
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Eric Carlson wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> >
> > * Whether to include a multiplexed download functionality in browsers for
> media resources, where the browser would do the multiplexing of the active
&
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > That requires editing the resource. Think about it from a process
> > point-of-view: you're a Web developer and have been given a set of media
> >
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:42:04 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, so the only conform
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > We've in the past talked about how there is a need to adapt the bitrate
> > version of a audio or video resource that is being delivered to a user
> > agent
> When the user chooses to download the full video, the full Matroska file
> > is downloaded with no overhead. The downside is the server-side demuxing
> > and remuxing; fortunately most users only need to choose once. Also,
> > there's the problem of having to download the fu
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> >
> > I think we both agree but aren't understanding each other very well, or
> I'm
> > not thinking very clearly. People will write players assuming that
> currentTime
> > starts at 0 and e
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 12.08.2010 10:09, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> The core "problem" is that WebSRT is far too compatible with existing SRT
>> usage. Regardless of the file extension and MIME type used, it's quite
>> improbable that anyone will h
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:11:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:32 +0200
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Chris Double wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Zachary Ozer
> wrote:
> >
> > It would still be nice if the made dropped frame information
> > available, but that's probably not in the cards.
> >
>
> I have a work in progress bug with patch that adds this
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Zachary Ozer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > As far as I am aware, the adaptive HTTP streaming approaches work with an
> > ordinary HTTP server such as Apache, so do not need anything special on
> the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Zachary Ozer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > It's good to have thought this through. I agree, this isn't a workable
> > solution, since the whole bandwidth switching logic is introduced into
>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:32 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:43:01 +0200
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:09:34 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HTML and CSS have predefined structures within which their languages grow
>> and are able to grow. WebSRT ha
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:43:01 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> I have checked the parse spec and
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:35:30 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren
>> wrote:
>>
>>> While players are transitioni
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:30:23 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren
>> wrote:
>>
>
> Also, I can see that structur
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:43:01 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's a good approach and will reduce the need for breaking
>> backwards-compatibility. In an xml-based f
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Zachary Ozer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > Have you looked at the @media attribute? I would suggest to put them
> there.
> > As that's not currently specified in media queries, you might want to
&g
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:34:02 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:57:39 +0200
Have you looked at the @media attribute? I would suggest to put them there.
As that's not currently specified in media queries, you might want to
demonstrate how it could work and make a proposal to extend the media
queries.
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Zachary Ozer wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:57:39 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
>> wrote:
>>
>> * th
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> (This is presumably slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. I've set
> follow-ups to the WHATWG list.)
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> > >
> > > However I've looked at w
Hi Philip,
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> If @profile should have any influence on the parser it sounds like this
> isn't actually XML at all. In particular, the "HTML" would have to be
> well-formed XML, but would still end up in the null namespace.
Yeah, you are r
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> Snipping liberally...
>
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:01:47 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> CONSIDERING EXISTING FORMATS
>>
>
> Note that the subtitling community has
Hi Ian,
I think there's a typo in the description of the TimedTrack mode at
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/video.html#timed-track-mode.
It says:
Hidden
Indicates that the timed track is active, but that the user agent is not
actively displaying the cues. If no attempt
Hi Ian, all,
I'd like to pick up again on the discussion about what file format should be
supported as baseline in HTML5 for providing time-synchronized text for
media resources. This is particularly important now that we have the WebSRT
proposal http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/w
ackground image sprites you
> > can have a CSS class that abstracts away the name of the sprite image.
> > With tags you would have to specify the URL and height/width
> > individually on every sprited image.
>
> I think the right solution is a fragment identifier.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:01:26 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:53:43 +0200
Some further thoughts on the element.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#the-track-element
The @kind attribute is currently serving several purposes. This may be ok,
but we need to be aware of it and maybe include a note in its description
about it.
Firstly,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:53:43 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:02:34 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:58:07 +0200
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:53:50 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt > >wrote:
>>
>> I actually don't think there
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:58:07 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 23, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Phili
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> I actually don't think there's anything wrong about the spec as it is.
>
> NETWORK_NO_SOURCE is not a state of failure, it is a waiting state. Here's
> what happens as the parser inserts elements into the DOM:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
ked at were in UTF-8, but in all sorts of other
character sets. Another solution to this problem would be to have
WebSRT know what charset their characters are in - then we don't need
to add such information to the element. It will still not work
with legacy SRT files though.
** Then the quest
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>
> Silvia made we aware of discrepancy in how browsers implement the resource
> selection algorithm, see forwarded message. It's my assessment that Opera is
> the only browser foll
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Paul Ellis wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>> On Jul 23, 2010, at 08:40, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> > - Keep implementation costs for standalone players low.
>>
>> I think this should be a non-goal. It seems to me that trying to cater
Is that URLs as values of attributes in HTML or is that URLs as pasted into
the address bar? I believe their processing differs...
Good luck with it, anyway. I'm sure you've seen http://esw.w3.org/UriTesting
.
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I've begun worki
sn't
> NETWORK_NO_SOURCE.
>
> Test case: http://people.opera.com/philipj/2010/07/23/networkState.html
>
> Please fix implementation or spec :)
>
>
> --
> Philip Jägenstedt
> Core Developer
> Opera Software
>
> --- Forwarded message ---
> From: &q
To me, stalled implies that the UA is trying to receive stuff, but is
being stalled. So, my understanding is that the resource fetch
algorithm in [1] should include the word "unexpectedly" - that would
fix it. Then, if no data has been received for more than 3 seconds,
the "stalled" event would be
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Marques Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
>> at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
>
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:23 AM, timeless wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> Note that I do understand the need and am trying to explain how it can
>> be made to work. Also I am trying to show that what might look as the
>> simplest app
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
>> type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
>> would need to s
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:43 PM, timeless wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
> wrote:
>> It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
>> element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
>> "file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15" is an Ogg Theora segment out of a
ent.
The whole media fragment URI spec is based on retrieving byte ranges.
I'd encourage you to read it and see if it matches your expectations.
Cheers,
Silvia.
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> Actually, a point in time is nothing - it's an em
selected point to the end of the video, given
> that most commonly when wanting to point out a particular point in a
> video you actually just want to represent a point.
>
> / Jonas
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> BTW: I will try and
BTW: I will try and make a screencast of that firefox plugin, which
should clarify things further. Stay tuned...
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi Silvia,
>>
>
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Hi Silvia,
>
> Back in may last year I brought [1] up the fact that there are two use
> cases for temporal media fragments:
>
> 1. Skipping to a particular point in a longer resource, such as
> wanting to start a video at a particul
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:11:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
>> at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
>&g
Hi all,
The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
The idea of the spec is to enable addressing sub-parts of audio-visual
resources through URIs, such as http://example.com/video.ogv?t=10,40
to address seconds 10-40 out of video.o
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:35 PM, schalk wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Has anyone/everyone read the blog entry on Youtube’s blog
> (http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/06/flash-and-html5-tag.html) regarding their
> feeling about HTML5 video and why they still feel that Flash for video is the
> preferred choic
201 - 300 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
