How is that productive? I realize that it's meant as a joke but it does nothing
but add to the impression that some in the WHATWG community just don't care
about civility, respect, and cooperation.
The best thing to counteract that impression is to prove it wrong.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:51 AM,
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the file://
scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide a choice
between selecting local files and entering an http/ftp url?
On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
It would then be the server's
, at 10:45 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Simpson, Grant Leyton
glsim...@indiana.edu wrote:
Are you wanting the user to manually enter the filename, including the
file:// scheme? If not, are you envisioning the file dialog box to provide a
choice between selecting local
For the record, I don't disagree with any of what you said below.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Daniel Persson wrote:
But wouldn't we create a situation where the main content tag is misused and
essentially then we'd recreate the situation with body?
IMHO you can't stop tags from being misused,
But wouldn't we create a situation where the main content tag is misused and
essentially then we'd recreate the situation with body?
Best,
Grant
On Jun 4, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Daniel Persson wrote:
I am not advocating ad-tags. The idea of globally structuring content on the
web is very
One question I have off the top of my head is how updates are handled. I like
the idea of better integration with the OS and the browser but I don't want to
lose one of what I see as the best elements of web app development, namely the
need to not have to update clients' copies of the app
, at 10:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:12:44 +0200, Simpson, Grant Leyton
glsim...@indiana.edu wrote:
One question I have off the top of my head is how updates are handled. I
like the idea of better integration with the OS and the browser but I
don't want to lose one
I was unaware of the Microdata spec. Now that I have seen it, I think it
offers a lot of power and flexibility. I think it should adequately cover the
use case I was thinking of.
I'm in favor of adding a non-normative note to the section of the HTML5 spec
that discusses cite that
On May 6, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
Consider how the above would work in legacy browsers, and then consider
how this would work in them:
pAs Ashley Crandall Amos says in citea
href=http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans;Linguistic Means of
Determining the Dates
Dear WHATWG list participants,
Forgive me if this conversation has been had before; I've just recently joined
the list.
Is there any value in adding an href or uri or similar attribute to the
cite element to indicate a location for a work (or information about the
work) or, in the case of a
10 matches
Mail list logo
