Hello!
You have a new message, please read
<http://yourdentalfirst.com.previewdns.com/support.php?gkp5j>
whatwg
Hello!
New message, please read <http://getsport.pro/economics.php?8>
whatwg
To post feedback to the WHATWG list, please subscribe first (and post
from the same e-mail address as you subscribed from). We require this
because of the level of spam the list would otherwise receive.
If you just want to submit drive-by feedback and aren't concerned
about receiving a reply, you
Please reinstate this feature (Web Forms 2 / Repetition Model) on the
official specification.
My use-case/ justification is explained on this forum thread:
http://forums.whatwg.org/bb3/viewtopic.php?f=3t=4717
I want a declarative solution for simple repetition (e.g. for
scientific data
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Mounir Lamouri mounir.lamo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/31/2010 02:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
The current specification of :invalid is pretty simple: it matches all
invalid elements which are candidate for
This question is sort of CSS related, but I think it's worth bringing up
here, assuming it hasn't already been discussed.
The first thing I wanted to do with the required attribute when I started
playing with it is to use the CSS :after pseudo-element to add an asterisk
after every required
Hi. I am an author web developer.
Searching the latest HTML5 spec I could find [1], the only references to a
command to copy to clipboard involve the drag-and-drop API.
I personally would like to see a cross-browser way to invoke a
copy-to-clipboard command without using any drag-and-drop
--- On Mon, 6/29/09, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
2. The remaining H.264 baseline patents owned by companies
who are not
willing to license them royalty-free expire,
leading to H.264 support
being available without license fees. =
H.264 becomes the de facto
codec for
--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
It was suggested here that MJPEG be added as a
baseline. I considered
this as an option for Wikipedia video support some years
ago before we
had the Theora in Java playback working. I quickly
determined that it
was
--- On Tue, 6/30/09, Mikko Rantalainen mikko.rantalai...@peda.net wrote:
(2) Specify {Theora or H.264} as the baseline. That way all
vendors that
have displayed any interest for video could
implement the spec.
Authors would be required to provide the video in both
formats to be
sure
Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 video tag questions
To: Chris Double chris.dou...@double.co.nz
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, jjcogliati-wha...@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 6:55 AM
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:49 AM,
Chris Doublechris.dou...@double.co.nz
I read section 4.8.7 The video element and I have some questions:
1. What happens if the user agent supports the video tag but does not support
the particular video codec that the video file has? Should it display the
fallback content in that case, and if so, can a video tag be put inside
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Codec mess with video and audio tags
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 9:30 AM
2009/6/7 jjcogliati-wha...@yahoo.com:
There are concerns or issues
considering then.
--- On Sat, 5/30/09, Den.Molib den.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Den.Molib den.mo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] MPEG-1 subset proposal for HTML5 video codec
To: jjcogliati-wha...@yahoo.com, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 5:20 AM
I'm afraid
--- On Sat, 5/30/09, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] MPEG-1 subset proposal for HTML5 video codec
To: jjcogliati-wha...@yahoo.com
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 6:45 AM
Thank you for a very informative reply. Inline comments follow.
--- On Sun, 5/31/09, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] MPEG-1 subset proposal for HTML5 video codec
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009
I propose that a MPEG-1 subset should be considered as the required
codec for the HTML-5 video tag.
== MPEG-1 Background ==
MPEG-1 was published as the ISO standard ISO 11172 in August 1993. It
is a widely used standard for audio and video compression. Both
Windows Media and Apple Quicktime
From the Working Group?s charter the first deliverable is stated as:
?A language evolved from HTML4 for describing the semantics of
documents and applications on the World Wide Web. ???..?
Reading the draft specification and other related documentation a
number of fundamental questions
XHTML2 moves a lot of semantics and behavior from elements to global
attributes. For example, href can turn any element into a hyperlink,
and src can turn any element into an image.
I liked the href adding a link to any object, but the src, I don't care
for. I can already set a background
ddailey wrote:
The ease of using DOM methods to find tags, as opposed to attributes,
tends to suggest that all things having href's should be easily
findable by script. a works nicely for that, but would the
availability of a document.links array then include all things with
href's?
In
Hickson how
WHATWG would handle divergence in the W3C spec [1], he said he
intended to make every effort to keep the two in sync. [2] While I
appreciate his effort and I fully believe that he will do his best,
we are dealing with a body (i.e. the W3C) who have a history of
stubbornness
was wondering; how should block break behaviour work? I have written a
small document on block break behaviour and I was wondering whether or not this
is valuable for the WA spec.
http://jorgenhorstink.nl/projects/whatwg/blockbreak.htm
The document is not even nearly complete, but I want to start
22 matches
Mail list logo
