Re: [whatwg] Adaptive Image Element Proposal

2012-09-05 Thread Kornel Lesiński
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:53:57 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: If we say that should have img role, then we imply that alternative text should be provided via an attribute. Why? Because that is what ARIA 1.0 says about the img role: "In order for elements with a role of img be perceivable

Re: [whatwg] Adaptive Image Element Proposal

2012-09-04 Thread Kornel Lesiński
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:47:15 +0100, Adrian Roselli wrote: My point was more about @alt being solely for non-sighted users. I felt that starting off with that premise could lead to conclusions based on a faulty base. Ah, sorry. Of course instead of "sighted/non-sighted" I should have said

Re: [whatwg] Adaptive Image Element Proposal

2012-09-04 Thread Kornel Lesiński
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:01:32 +0100, Adrian Roselli wrote: > So, how would the hyperlink in this example work for *all* users? I disagree with premise of this question. I don't think it should work for all users. If the link is in alternative content, then by definition it is intended o