[whatwg] Expected behaviour when a base is within an innerHTML fragment

2007-02-11 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
To take this from a discussion last month on atom-syntax: What is meant to happen if you set innerHTML of a div where the set value has both a base and an a? - Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: [whatwg] Expected behaviour when a base is within an innerHTML fragment

2007-02-11 Thread Jorgen Horstink
On Feb 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: To take this from a discussion last month on atom-syntax: What is meant to happen if you set innerHTML of a div where the set value has both a base and an a? first of all the base element can only be inserted in HTML documents.

Re: [whatwg] Expected behaviour when a base is within an innerHTML fragment

2007-02-11 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:37:50 +0100, Jorgen Horstink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To take this from a discussion last month on atom-syntax: What is meant to happen if you set innerHTML of a div where the set value has both a base and an a? There's an open issue on this: Need to cope with second

Re: [whatwg] Expected behaviour when a base is within an innerHTML fragment

2007-02-11 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
On 11 Feb 2007, at 11:37, Jorgen Horstink wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: To take this from a discussion last month on atom-syntax: What is meant to happen if you set innerHTML of a div where the set value has both a base and an a? first of all the base

Re: [whatwg] Expected behaviour when a base is within an innerHTML fragment

2007-02-11 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
On 11 Feb 2007, at 15:11, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: The point is whether it: a) Gets inserted into the head, and changes all the links in the document. b) Appears in some magic place, and changes the links in the HTML fragment. c) Gets ignored. I'm personally in favour of b), as