On May 28, 2006, at 12:38, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
Now, to be fair, I don't really care either way,
just looking for consistency... should using fillRect/strokeRect be
defined as convenience functions doing the same job as creating a
rectangular path and calling fill/stroke?
What do underlyi
Doesn't a zero-width (or zero-height, as long as it's only one)
degenerate into a vertical (horizontal) line when stroked, due to the
line width? A filled rectangle doesn't, because the area to fill is
defined exactly by the rectangular path (which has 0 thickness),
whereas a stroked path takes t
I think http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#strokerect must
have no effect when it has a zero height or width (or both). Currently
Safari, Firefox and Opera act that way when they are both zero and
Safari acts that way for all cases. Firefox and Opera draw a small
line when eithe
