Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
I am not against new things really. It just appears as
UA will look like Christmas tree one day.
Each member of the family is adding their own stuff.
And someone put there SQL engine because it happens to lie on the shelf
nearby and granddad decide that his old canvas will
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Web App developers are used to using SQL to access storage on the
server. Web apps that add offline support are likely to want to store
data on the client with a similar structure to data on the server. If
some form of object persistence is desired, it could be implem
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a question: why SQL was chosen as client side storage for Web
> > > Applications?
> >
> > Because it's what most app developers are already used to -- the M in
> > the widely used traditional LAMP stack is SQL.
>
> "most app deve
On Sep 24, 2007, at 11:45 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
I have a question: why SQL was chosen as client side storage for
Web Applications?
Because it's what most app developers are already used to -- the M
in the widely use
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
I have a question: why SQL was chosen as client side storage for Web
Applications?
Because it's what most app developers are already used to -- the M in the
widely used traditional LAMP stack is SQL.
"most app devel
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>
> I have a question: why SQL was chosen as client side storage for Web
> Applications?
Because it's what most app developers are already used to -- the M in the
widely used traditional LAMP stack is SQL.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E
