I don't think the spec is clear enough defining these two elements from an
author's perspective.
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of content
that is tangentially related to the content around the aside element, and
which could be considered separate from that
On Sun, 10 May 2009 08:58:47 +0100, Bruce Lawson bru...@opera.com wrote:
Typo in last email: I meant
For example, in the middle of a fictional interview about markup, I might
want to pull out a quote and citation: Do I write
aside
blockquoteAfter a sip of sweet sherry, I turn into Mr Last
One of the more elaborate use cases I collected from the e-mails sent in
over the past few months was the following:
USE CASE: Annotate structured data that HTML has no semantics for, and
which nobody has annotated before, and may never again, for private use or
use in a small
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
One of the more elaborate use cases I collected from the e-mails sent in
over the past few months was the following:
USE CASE: Annotate structured data that HTML has no semantics for, and
which nobody has annotated
Since a new section detailing HTML5's handling of custom microdata has
been added to the HTML5 spec
(tracked here http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=3073to=3074
and displayed here http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#microdata
and announced
Sorry for the double emails today.
I will continue with revisiting the use cases for the microdata section.
One additional component I'll add to the use cases is applying my
interpretation of how RDFa might handle the use case, as compared to
how it could be handled with Ian's new HTML5
Quoting Philip Taylor excors+wha...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
One of the more elaborate use cases I collected from the e-mails sent in
over the past few months was the following:
USE CASE: Annotate structured data that HTML has no
Shelley Powers wrote:
Since a new section detailing HTML5's handling of custom microdata has
been added to the HTML5 spec
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#microdata
I've only had a brief chance to look over the HTML5 Microdata spec, but
there is one big problem that overrides all
Julian wrote:
You are aware of MNot's Web Linking draft
(http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.html),
and the fact that it seems to enjoy support from the TAG?
Julian, you continue to bring this up as if we hadn't already discussed
this: there are significant
Ben Adida ben at adida.net Sun May 10 15:29:53 PDT 2009:
Julian wrote:
You are aware of MNot's Web Linking draft
(http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.html),
and the fact that it seems to enjoy support from the TAG?
Julian, you continue to bring this up as
I was asked by a client if it was possible to implement something similar to
the asynchronous file upload used on gmail using only standard web
technologies.
Looking at the gmail source code I can see that they use some flash magic.
And by reading the HTML5 spec I could not find a way to
W liście Samuel Santos z dnia poniedziałek 11 maja 2009:
I was asked by a client if it was possible to implement something similar
to the asynchronous file upload used on gmail using only standard web
technologies.
Looking at the gmail source code I can see that they use some flash magic.
There appears to be some W3C activity regarding this problem. There is a
draft about
file uploads[1] which is edited by a Mozilla employee. This is not
accidentally. As of Firefox 3
we have the possibility of Ajax file uploads. The API resembles pretty
much the draft.
Also, Safari 4 and
At 14:09 +1000 9/05/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
you might try loading, say, the one-page version of the HTML5
spec. from the
WhatWG site...it takes quite a while. Happily Ian also provides a
multi-page, but this is not always the case.
That just confirms the problem and it's obviously
14 matches
Mail list logo
