On 17 March 2014 21:15, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Dan Brickley wrote:
We discussed this (and the -inv suggestion) at schema.org again, and the
consensus there was that we'd like to have the search engines proceed
with accepting an experimental/proposed 'inverse
Hi,
I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]:
void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation);
SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it
optional as well? I think it should be optional, especially because creating an
SVGMatrix at the moment
Hi,
I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]:
void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation);
SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it
optional as well? I think it should be optional, especially because creating an
SVGMatrix at the moment means
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]:
void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation);
SVGMatrix is nullable but can not be omitted all together. Why isn’t it
optional as well? I think it
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I just looked at the definition of Path.addPath[1]:
void addPath(Path path, SVGMatrix? transformation);
SVGMatrix is nullable but
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Apologize if it was already discussed but I couldn't find a mail to this
topic.
Yes, this was brought up a couple of times.
Last exchange was in Sept of 2012 (!):
On Mar 19, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Rik Cabanier
caban...@gmail.commailto:caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad
ju...@google.commailto:ju...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dirk Schulze
dschu...@adobe.commailto:dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
