Re: [whatwg] image captions

Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:50:36 +0300, Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Le 27 juin 2006 à 6:00, dolphinling a écrit : What's wrong with This is the caption. ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as being common enough to warrant a separate element of i

Re: [whatwg] image captions

Le 27 juin 2006 à 6:00, dolphinling a écrit : What's wrong with This is the caption. ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as being common enough to warrant a separate element of its own. The problem is that this means nothing. The paragraph could be the capt

Re: [whatwg] image captions

Quoting David Walbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: For scripting purposes I have occasionally needed to tie an image and its caption explicitly by giving them related IDs that a particular javascript function can call (e.g. img id="img1" and p id="img- caption"), and it would be helpful in these situatio

Re: [whatwg] image captions

Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:42:13 +0300, dolphinling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: Mihai Sucan wrote: There's nothing "wrong" with that. Yet, that's not exactly an image caption. There's no explicit association between the and the following . But there's the implicit association given by the

Re: [whatwg] image captions

On Jun 27, 2006, at 7:42 AM, dolphinling wrote:But there's the implicit association given by the fact that they're there, together, in the , and nothing else is. Do you really need anything more than that? There is also the implicit association given by the fact that the caption immediately follows

Re: [whatwg] image captions

Mihai Sucan wrote: Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:00:21 +0300, dolphinling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with This is the caption. ? That's how I think of it semantical

Re: [whatwg] image captions

Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:00:21 +0300, dolphinling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with This is the caption. ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see

Re: [whatwg] image captions

fantasai wrote: I'm wondering what WA1 considers appropriate markup for a figure with a caption. ~fantasai What's wrong with This is the caption. ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as being common enough to warrant a separate element of its own. -- dolphinl

Re: [whatwg] Spellchecking proposal #2

Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: On Jun 25, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: ... But realistically, browsers won't "allow the user to easily override it if they want to", because any interface for doing that would be absurd. ... I'm sure there are other people that

Re: [whatwg] [HTML5] Named start values for lists?

Lachlan Hunt wrote: dolphinling wrote: HTML5 brings back the |start| attribute on ordered lists. This allows a list to semantically start with a number other than one. It seems like the major use case for this is to split lists up, so that a single list is marked by multiple s. Other use cas

Re: [whatwg] [HTML5] Named start values for lists?

Quoting Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: However, there are several issues that would need to be addressed: [List of good points] * How does it interact with CSS counters. -- Anne van Kesteren