On Oct 9, 2006, at 01:32, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
As UAs become more sophisticated, they can analyze the pattern
attribute and present more context-sensitive error messages than
any such attribute could. For example:
* 410 is too much; this number must be 300 or less.
* 178 is too
Dean Edwards wrote:
The point is that there is room for all of these methods for
retrieving DOM nodes. As there is no useful existing standard let's
add stuff that people actually want instead of referring them to
vapour ware.
I guess the question is why bother with getElementByClassName if a
On Oct 18, 2006, at 01:27, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
I just tried to check out how custom element and attribute names
work in current browsers and how they are supposed to work in
HTML5, and some issues seem unclear to me.
...
4) Sivonen's HTML5 validator (http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/
Henri Sivonen wrote:
HTML+ used dl for dialog. As far as default presentation goes, dl
is the best fit for marking up dialog. Yet, the semantic markup party
line is against it.
I think there are two reasons for insisting that dl shouldn't be
used for dialogs, i.e. that dl really is a
On Aug 29, 2006, at 10:44, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Should one expect HTML table row/column integrity to become an
HTML5 conformance requirement?
My plan is to spend November prototyping conformance checker parts
that don't belong in the parser, don't belong in schemas (RELAX NG or
There seems to be a question on how confusing a method would be for developers.
I went and asked 4
people I know that are just learning Javascript for the first time. For two of
them javascript is
their first programing language, the other two already know other languages.
Given this markup:
p
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Should one expect HTML table row/column integrity to become an HTML5
conformance requirement?
I'd appreciate some indication on what I should expect in this area,
i.e. whether it makes sense to prototype a table integrity checker based
on
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Jonathan Worent wrote:
When asked if they would prefer a comma separated list or an array,
there were mixed feelings. Three indicated a preference to a comma
separated list, the other said he would expect to pass an array. Given
this I would suggest not
Gervase Markham wrote:
Stefan Haustein wrote:
I think drawElement(elem) opens up a whole new can of worms:
- how would an application determine the size of the text box?
- where is the baseline position, needed for exact axis label
positioning?
- there are probably issues with dynamically
Na , Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Dean Edwards wrote:
Personally, I prefer a comma delimited list. Passing an array seems
yukky.
Really? I always thought the comma-separated argument to window.open()
was
one of the ugliest APIs ever...
Are there any
I think a drawText method would be extremely useful.
Rather than specifying stylistic information explicitly (via a font
object), I'd use a special parenthetical pseudo-element. thus
allowing the author to specify the style as for any other element on
a page something like this...
Na , Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
The question is.. is there really the need for the array ? Most bindings
support variable arguments.
The initial proposal used varargs, but people pointed out that that made
it difficult to call the method
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Na , Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
The question is.. is there really the need for the array ? Most
bindings support variable arguments.
The initial proposal used varargs, but people pointed
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Dean Edwards wrote:
Personally, I prefer a comma delimited list. Passing an array seems
yukky.
Really? I always thought the comma-separated argument to window.open() was
one of the ugliest APIs ever...
This isn't the same thing. We are faking
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:17:20 +0700, Joao Eiras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an array. Most languages support arrays. Why would there be a
problem?
The question is.. is there really the need for the array ?
Most bindings support variable arguments.
Array: getElementsByClassName([c1, c2]);
15 matches
Mail list logo