On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:41:58 +0100, Eli Naeher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you elaborate on these barriers? I would really like to see inline
SVG.
http://annevankesteren.nl/2007/10/svg-html has a high-level overview. The
main problem is how the HTML parser as defined by the HTML5
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:19:37 +1100, Mathieu HENRI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Graham wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
... I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as easily as I can a JPEG or PNG. I read over the
recently-released HTML5 draft and
Embedding SVG by reference (thought the img element) is well suited to HTML.
SVG was designed for this as stated in Embedding by reference section here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/concepts.html#UsageOptions
I tested Opera's support for SVG through the img element and it incorrectly
clips the
Dnia 24-01-2008, Cz o godzinie 08:50 -0500, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
pisze:
Embedding SVG by reference (thought the img element) is well suited to HTML.
SVG was designed for this as stated in Embedding by reference section here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/concepts.html#UsageOptions
This
Dnia 23-01-2008, Śr o godzinie 14:44 -0500, Sam Ruby pisze:
On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVG is too heavyweight
for the purpose of such tiny presentational enhancements.
I can provide counterexamples:
http://intertwingly.net/blog/
Dnia 24-01-2008, Cz o godzinie 07:34 +1100, Charles McCathieNevile
pisze:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:59 +1100, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SVG is too heavyweight
for the purpose of such tiny
On 24/01/2008, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby grant you the right to use in-line SVG
provided the only element used inside is solid filled path.
(No gradients, transformations, mitres, text and such).
I remember using VML in this spirit myself.
Thanks for the
Forgive me if this is a simple and obvious question. I note that all
current browsers (except IE, of course) implement SVG rendering (to a
better or worse degree). I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as easily as I can a JPEG or PNG. I read over the
recently-released HTML5
David Gerard wrote:
Forgive me if this is a simple and obvious question. I note that all
current browsers (except IE, of course) implement SVG rendering (to a
better or worse degree). I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as easily as I can a JPEG or PNG. I read over the
On 23/01/2008, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In browsers which support it img src=foo.svg will work (with certain
limitations for security reasons).
img src=foo.svg is just what I was hoping for, thank you :-) Doesn't
yet seem to work in Safari 3.0.4, SeaMonkey 1.1.7 or Minefield
David Gerard wrote:
On 23/01/2008, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In browsers which support it img src=foo.svg will work (with certain
limitations for security reasons).
img src=foo.svg is just what I was hoping for, thank you :-) Doesn't
yet seem to work in Safari 3.0.4, SeaMonkey
On 23/01/2008, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:55:27 +0100, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
img src=foo.svg is just what I was hoping for, thank you :-) Doesn't
yet seem to work in Safari 3.0.4, SeaMonkey 1.1.7 or Minefield
(Firefox 3 nightly)
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:55 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 23/01/2008, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In browsers which support it img src=foo.svg will work (with
certain
limitations for security reasons).
img src=foo.svg is just what I was hoping for, thank you :-) Doesn't
yet seem to
On 23/01/2008, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works somewhat in SeaMonkey (gives default specified rendering size of
image in a small object box with scroll bars) and Safari (gives
default size in small box with no scroll bars, i.e. top left corner
only) and best in Minefield (scales
James Graham wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Forgive me if this is a simple and obvious question. I note that all
current browsers (except IE, of course) implement SVG rendering (to a
better or worse degree). I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as easily as I can a JPEG or PNG.
Dnia 23-01-2008, Śr o godzinie 13:42 +, David Gerard pisze:
Forgive me if this is a simple and obvious question. I note that all
current browsers (except IE, of course) implement SVG rendering (to a
better or worse degree). I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as
On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVG is too heavyweight
for the purpose of such tiny presentational enhancements.
I can provide counterexamples:
http://intertwingly.net/blog/
http://intertwingly.net/blog/archives/
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:19:37 +1100, Mathieu HENRI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Graham wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
... I'd like to be able to drop SVG images into
an HTML page as easily as I can a JPEG or PNG. I read over the
recently-released HTML5 draft and couldn't work out how I'd do
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:59 +1100, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SVG is too heavyweight
for the purpose of such tiny presentational enhancements.
I can provide counterexamples:
http://intertwingly.net/blog/
On 23/01/2008, Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An image is not a replacement for text in the real world, only in Ian's
current drafts. And where it is, SVG is ideal for having beautifully
styled selectable interactive text that is lightweight and easy to create
(or heavyweight
Dnia 23-01-2008, Śr o godzinie 20:42 +, David Gerard pisze:
FWIW, my use case is to be able to create images in SVG and just use
them as ... images, just like I do PNGs or JPEGs. It was also somewhat
inspired by setting up rsvg for MediaWiki on our work intranet and
wanting to hit it
On Jan 23, 2008 10:42 PM, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Chris is incorrect in his assertion because clients can be
presumed to have increasing amounts of rendering power available just
to make pretty pictures.
please don't assume this. an n800 or n810 does not have much
On 23/01/2008, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every browser (except IE) *has* SVG rendering.
That's not true. MicroB as shipped w/ OS 2008 on the N810 (and in OS
Sorry, you're right. I was thinking only of the desktop. Bad move.
Firefox 3 will have *accurate* SVG rendering.
who's
23 matches
Mail list logo
