Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-10-01 Thread Křištof Želechovski
: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search The magnifying glass was a particularly poor choice by Apple[1], because icons featuring one usually represent zooming (in). Binoculars are (for some reason) more common as symbols for searches. Eyes and spectacles OTOH most often represent

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-10-01 Thread Garrett Smith
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andy Lyttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 30, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Christoph Päper wrote: Anyhow, the appearance of this or other types of |input| should not be specified by HTML5 / WF2+. Of course browsers could choose what the icon should look like; Would

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-10-01 Thread João Eiras
Would it be desirable to allow the icon to be specified in css? That's up to the author/user agent, and currently you can have a small icon in the background of an edit field with regular css. On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:46

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Andy Lyttle
On Sep 30, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: How can the Web designer know how many recent search terms the user would like to keep handy at the search box? The same way the web designer knows anything else: taking an educated guess at what would be most appropriate for their

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Andy Lyttle
On Sep 30, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: I assume that this should be based on the search elements ID attribute, am I right ? Because common UA behaviour already is to cache entries (based on ID) ... so what unsolved problem is solved there ? If I have a form on my site,

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Kristof Zelechovski
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Lyttle Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:03 PM To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search On Sep 30, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: How can the Web designer know how many

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Andy Lyttle
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: I am not against INPUT[type=search]; I am against INPUT[results=10] because I cannot see how it can be reasonably preset. Yeah, that's weird. I think if I designed it myself, I would have made the presence of autosave (instead of

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:40:23 +0100, Andy Lyttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like Apple's input type=search adopted as an official standard, maintaining Safari compatibility. Comments? I like type=search. Special search box style is used throughout Mac OS X and Mac-centric sites

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Christoph Päper
Andy Lyttle: results - if present, shows a little magnifying glass icon, which helps to visually identify the field as a search box The magnifying glass was a particularly poor choice by Apple[1], because icons featuring one usually represent zooming (in). Binoculars are (for some

Re: [whatwg] Safari-compatible input type=search

2008-09-30 Thread Andy Lyttle
On Sep 30, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Christoph Päper wrote: The magnifying glass was a particularly poor choice by Apple[1], because icons featuring one usually represent zooming (in). Binoculars are (for some reason) more common as symbols for searches. Eyes and spectacles OTOH most often