On Fri, 9 May 2008, �ke J�rvklo wrote:
2008/5/9 Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there really any need to escape the contents of script/style at
all These days?
I don't know - does HTML5 currently handle situations like script
type=text/javascriptdocument.write('/script');/script for
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Simon Pieters wrote:
Is there really any need to escape the contents of
script/style at all These days?
No, but AIUI the reaction was more like Hey, HTML 5 doesn't say
anything about escaping script/style, does that mean that it doesn't
support escaped
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Simon Pieters wrote:
From http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=38
I can extract two requests.
1. Explain how authors are supposed to comment their script and
style elements in HTML5. (Post #171.)
Something along the following lines could be inserted as a note
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Simon Pieters wrote:
From http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=38
I can extract two requests.
1. Explain how authors are supposed to comment their script and
style elements in HTML5.
On Fri, 09 May 2008 00:50:20 +0100, Samuel Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In order to validate a page as valid HTML/XHTML you need to escape inline
script when using characters like .
You can use:
/*![CDATA[*/ /*]]*/
It's compatible with both HTML and XHTML.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
(Thanks for forwarding forum feedback to the list. Feel free to forward my
reply back to the forums, and please do continue to forward feedback from
the forums, or blogs, or anywhere else, to the list!)
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Simon Pieters wrote:
From
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:19:11 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=38
I can extract two requests.
Another now (post #193):
Make noscript allowed in XHTML5, and generally remove differences
between HTML5 and XHTML5 where possible.
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:25:07 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Make noscript allowed in XHTML5, and generally remove differences
between HTML5 and XHTML5 where possible.
The use case it has in HTML5 is that you can include img src=tracker or
something in there so you have some
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:31:00 +0200, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:25:07 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Make noscript allowed in XHTML5, and generally remove differences
between HTML5 and XHTML5 where possible.
The use case it has in
Simon Pieters wrote:
This could thus also imply:
* Don't disallow lang= in XHTML5
* Don't disallow base href in XHTML5.
* Don't disallow meta charset in XHTML5 (it doesn't do any good, but
doesn't harm either).
When using these, though, generic XML tools (i.e., those that aren't
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:42:09 +0200, Martin Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Pieters wrote:
This could thus also imply:
* Don't disallow lang= in XHTML5
* Don't disallow base href in XHTML5.
* Don't disallow meta charset in XHTML5 (it doesn't do any good, but
doesn't harm either).
11 matches
Mail list logo
