I've been convinced that the there's not enough need for a sic element to
introduce one, mostly by
Tab Atkins Jr.
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-December/029585.html
and Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Am 31.12.2010 17:30 schrieb Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Martin Janeckewhatwg@kaor.in wrote:
[snip]
Apart from informing human readers about the correct reproduction of a
misspelled word, a HTMLsic would indicate the same to web applications.
Think of a search
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Would search engines benefit from markup for this?
They could actually benefit, if the correct spelling would be added in an
attribute, so they could match the misspelled word with a correctly spelled
search term; somehow
Am 30.12.2010 um 22:49 schrieb Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Martin Janecke whatwg@kaor.in wrote:
I don't think mark is appropriate for what I meant.
I as the publisher usually don't mean[1] to point a readers attention at
spelling errors by someone I quote,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Martin Janecke whatwg@kaor.in wrote:
Am 30.12.2010 um 22:49 schrieb Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
1. What problem(s) does indicating where mistakes have been reproduced solve?
I understand the question in this context as a concrete formulation of
questions such
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Martin Janecke whatwg@kaor.in wrote:
Am 30.12.2010 um 22:49 schrieb Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis:
[snip]
1. What problem(s) does indicating where mistakes have been reproduced
solve?
I understand the question in this context as a concrete formulation of
Sorry...
And here's a transcription that doesn't use [sic] in the same place
although its publisher considered it important to indicate the correct
reproduction of the original source in some way as well, as you can tell by
looking into the wiki markup source code, where he added a comment
Am 30.12.2010 um 02:47 schrieb Ian Hickson:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Martin Janecke wrote:
I support this idea and I'd certainly use it. For example, I'm currently
copying an old rhyme book to hypertext and would love to mark
historically correct (but now incorrect) spelling, spelling
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Martin Janecke whatwg@kaor.in wrote:
I don't think mark is appropriate for what I meant.
I as the publisher usually don't mean[1] to point a readers attention at
spelling errors by someone I quote, I just want to be able to add semantic
markup that
