On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
High-end laptops have high-dpi screens (the Pixel I'm using right now
has one), and they're slowly spreading down the price scale.
On Mac there are Retinas of course, and on Windows Firefox defaults to a
non-1.0
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a thread on www-style:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0144.html
It's been in firefox for a while and blink is going to ship it soon:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:35:00 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Rick Waldron wrote:
Also, at the time, the surface click to play was non-standard and
incredibly annoying because it just showed up as someone's pet feature
in Firefox. (I'm still not sure if it's a
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:35:00 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I think you basically have to assume that if you specify controls then
the controls may accept clicks
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
Actually what I really think we should do is also change the
window.devicePixelRatio for pinch zoom. Combined with the suggestions
for
canvas, that would allow (as Rik pointed out on IRC) for high-quality
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:51:44 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
That might be good so that the behavior is consistent between browsers.
However, I think it should be conditional on whether the controls are
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
I'm curious: Is it useful to have fragment URL resolve against anything
other than the display url? I.e. when is the current behavior wrt
fragments appropriate.
It's a good
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
But then we shouldn't garble pathname either and we do because we have
to. So I'm not sure that line of reasoning makes sense. I do think we
should offer some kind of conversion
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
But then we shouldn't garble pathname either and we do because we
have to. So I'm not sure that line of reasoning makes sense. I do
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
I'm curious: Is it useful to have fragment URL resolve against
anything other than the display url? I.e. when is the current
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Pinch-zoom is hard because we don't want to trigger reflows or other
expensive behavior on pinch-zoom. I'd leave pinch-zoom out of it for
now.
Unless I'm missing something fundamental, changing the pixel density
doesn't cause a layout, it's
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Pinch-zoom is hard because we don't want to trigger reflows or other
expensive behavior on pinch-zoom. I'd leave pinch-zoom out of it for
now.
Unless I'm missing something
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Pinch-zoom is hard because we don't want to trigger reflows or other
expensive behavior on pinch-zoom. I'd leave pinch-zoom out of
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Stuart Langridge wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
but time is more of a problem if you have multiple things in one
cell. For example, one semi-common pattern is to put some data and
an input type=checkbox in a single
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Jake Archibald wrote:
Take http://jsbin.com/ifihex/1/edit - the image on this page receives a
valid full HTTP request, but the received data isn't valid image data
(it's html).
Starting from
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Dominic Mazzoni wrote:
We've finished implementing drawSystemFocusRing and drawCustomFocusRing
in Chrome. Try it in Chrome 31 or higher (either canary or dev channel
should work today). You'll need to go to chrome://flags and enable
*experimental canvas features*, then
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Simon Sarris wrote:
As an alternative [to resetClip()] I would propose something like
setClip() or setClip(path) (with the former working on the current path,
just like clip()/fill()/stroke() does).
Seems like this would have the same problems as resetClip(), since it's
On 9/11/13 6:05 PM, Gavin Barraclough wrote:
Interesting, I had just assumed this was okay – is it not spec-compliant for
Window.prototype to be a named properties object?
No, it's not. The spec defines exactly what the prototype chain looks
like here. See the definitions of [[Prototype]]
18 matches
Mail list logo
