As an alternative,common libraries could get shipped as browser
plugins, allowing developers to leverage local URIs such as
chrome:// in XUL/mozilla/firefox apps. This would only effectively
work if:
- all vendors define a same local URI prefix. I do like chrome://.
Mozilla dudes were
prefix is a neat idea. This could eliminate the need
for a new attribute. Is it as backwards-compatible?
- Joe
--
Chris Holland
http://webchattr.com/ - chat rooms done right.
* authoring of content in a specific way
* description of the alternative files on the server and their
features for the UA to download and use for switching
* a means to easily switch mid-way between these alternative files
I don't have something decent to offer for the first and last
;
>
>
> Test window.opener
>
> if (window.opener && !window.opener.closed)
> opener.location = '<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.example.org/">http://www.example.org/</a>'
>
>
>
> The page on foo.com will have changed to http://www.example.org/
> because this page had script access to that window. Obvious very serious
> phishing concern, and probably other concerns
>
>
>
>
--
Chris Holland
http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisholland
310-500-7598
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:42:25 -0800, Chris Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:14:52 +, Jim Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you're not advocating this to get around privacy based
proxies of the type that normally disable such referrer based
