hods, much less in a standards-producing
environment like the W3C.
I doubt the W3C can do much to legislate language, but I also doubt that
people in the WG (when formed) will need reminding of that. The terms
may be used in elevator pitches, but I'd expect that would be about it.
--
Robin
on the WHAT WG specifications. So make
sure your voice is heard over there by joining those lists and
expressing your opinions!
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
On Apr 12, 2006, at 14:25, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 19:35, fantasai wrote:
That seems odd. You should be able to say "the content model of
this element
is anything".
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/relax-CHP-12-
SECT-2.html#relax-CHP-12-SECT-2.1
From the spec:
"Thus, a R
On 11/09/2012 10:15 , Elliott Sprehn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
This would be a lot easier if I could somehow invoke the CSS box model
inside of SVG, ...
This tightly binds the list of element names in SVG to HTML
Which isn't that big of a problem. It's a
x/notes.html#h-B.2.2
Of course another option is to just not parse that into key-value pairs
in the first place.
By the way, it would also be nice for the query part of this API to be
usable in isolation.
+1
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
you could
transition your library into being a shim for seamless iframes.
That involves more than inclusion though (see
http://benvinegar.github.com/seamless-talk/) so you should probably
double-check that seamless is what your use case calls for.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
m the
XML planet in APIs with specific performance characteristics. They would
obviously be a lot simpler for JSON; I wonder how well that experience
translates.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
On 14/03/2013 15:59 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
So if the server replies with status 401 and a WWW-Authenticate header
that is properly formatted (I did not do detailed syntax checks but
e.g. WWW-Authenticate: basicerror does not work) is present, we prompt
the user. We do this for ,
On 14/03/2013 16:57 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
People who *do* rely on this (assuming they exist — in this case they
probably do somewhere) will find their services broken if we change it. So
on the face of things, I get the impression that
)?
Opening a blob URL in a new tab from a link works in at least Firefox
and Chrome, I guess they'd work just the same for those frame UIs.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
t's doing something useful in your document?
If so, please tell me its purpose here, then I'll know what it's for
and I won't complain about it again: __
Then the validator could add a wiki entry for it.
Going that far might be a bit much, b
On 04/06/2013 12:24 , Simon Pieters wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:03:58 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
I've seen quite a few. One recent example is bug-assist.js — a script
that makes it easy for readers of a document to file bugs about it —
that looks for all metadata names that start with
m the
indirection I reckon this approach has some nice properties and might
work if more direct ones don't.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
neral.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
I wonder if we couldn't just use the query part for this: src="/foo.zip?!zip/dahut.png">. No stripping is needed (as far as I know
servers would normally just serve foo.zip in this case), which
simplifies the model.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
On 13/09/2013 13:31 , Jirka Kosek wrote:
On 13.9.2013 12:10, Robin Berjon wrote:
I would rather we figured this out without , but apart from the
indirection I reckon this approach has some nice properties and might
work if more direct ones don't.
Also don't forget that while link
be found at:
http://www.w3.org/mid/eaf52201-ecaf-4f7f-839e-0585c085c...@anselm-hannemann.com
If your mail client can be somehow scripted to take advantage of this,
you can have it grab the MID to generate a link.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
work.
Isn't that just moving the problem though? If the CSS uses display-box:
contents (or whatever else might get added next) for some reason then
hidden won't work either. Less likely, but still.
Maybe having the default style use both display and display-box might fly?
--
Robin Ber
rotocol and format noodling would go. Personally, I think that that
distinction makes sense.
Note that going forward you'll probably want to look at
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/ rather than the TR snapshots.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
eliminate all other
sources — accessing would be sweet.
I don't much care about the syntax, but I guess we could be looking at
something like
navigator.getUserMedia("video multiple", function (devices) {
// ... show each different view
});
And I guess that's enough braindump for today :)
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
>>
>> If we are going to have Node.contains implementations surely could
>> optimize document.contains(node) which seems as clear as node.inDocument
>> to me.
>
> They are different in the case of multiple documents though.
But node.ownerDocument.contains(node) isn'
pen it's hardly a set of "rules that have not been disclosed in detail".
https://github.com/validator/validator
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
(which can
easily matter a fair bit on mobile) only to fail anyway.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
when navigating makes
sense to me.
+1
This has the added benefit of getting rid of the second argument wart.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
24 matches
Mail list logo