On 2014/06/26 12:58, Marcos Caceres wrote:
I would be in favor of this. It would be good to support the legacy content
as its use on the Web is significant. Search I did back in Oct 2013 found
these proprietary tags appeared on something like 1% of pages in Alexa's top
78K pages
1%!
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Mark Callow
callow.m...@artspark.co.jp wrote:
On 2014/06/26 12:58, Marcos Caceres wrote:
I would be in favor of this. It would be good to support the legacy content
as its use on the Web is significant. Search I did back in Oct 2013 found
these proprietary
On 06/26/2014 12:50 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On Jun 26, 2014, at 21:20, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On June 26, 2014 at 1:58:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Here's a first crack at a better spec:
Moved your text here:
https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net wrote:
On 06/26/2014 12:50 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On Jun 26, 2014, at 21:20, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On June 26, 2014 at 1:58:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalm...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Here's a first crack at a
Shall we enforce brand-color in head elements? it could make the
brand-color loaded ASAP, just like the favicon.
- Michael
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Kit Grose k...@studioiq.com.au wrote:
It feels utterly bizarre to me that this sort of property is declared in
the markup and not in the
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Tao Bai michael...@google.com wrote:
Shall we enforce brand-color in head elements? it could make the
brand-color loaded ASAP, just like the favicon.
Not needed, imo. If you put it in the head (or at least, early in the
body), it'll get read early; if you put
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Tao Bai wrote:
Hi, I have added brand-color meta extension in
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions, and would like have your
comment on it. Please check the detail on linked spec.
The cited spec mentions mapplication-navbutton-color and
The brand color is super set of them and not limited to use in the
navbutton or status bar, furthermore, not all browsers have navbutton or
status concept, it makes developer confused.
The mapplication-navbutton-color
and apple-mobile-web-app-status-bar-style are prefix and browser
specific,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
Folks at Mozilla and Google would like to standardize the `brand-color` meta
extension. The `brand-color` keyword has been added to the MetaExtensions
WHATWG wiki and a rough spec is below (prepared by some folks at
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
This feature has been developed in the past under multiple proprietary
names, such as mapplication-navbutton-color for Internet Explorer
and apple-mobile-web-app-status-bar-style for Mobile Safari.
Authors MUST NOT
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Tao Bai wrote:
The brand color is super set of them and not limited to use in the
navbutton or status bar, furthermore, not all browsers have navbutton or
status concept, it makes developer confused.
I don't think it confuses authors any more, and possibly a lot less,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
This feature has been developed in the past under multiple proprietary
names, such as mapplication-navbutton-color for Internet Explorer
and
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Tao Bai wrote:
The brand color is super set of them and not limited to use in the
navbutton or status bar, furthermore, not all browsers have navbutton or
status concept, it makes developer confused.
I
I would like to reiterate that brand- is not a good prefix for this purpose.
It has nothing to do with brands, and much more to do with the app or with
system integration.
On June 26, 2014 at 1:58:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Here's a first crack at a better spec:
Moved your text here:
https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color
We can better capture issues, etc. there. I also updated the Wiki to point
there as the official version. We
On Jun 26, 2014, at 21:20, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On June 26, 2014 at 1:58:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Here's a first crack at a better spec:
Moved your text here:
https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color
Could we change the name to something a tad
On June 26, 2014 at 2:17:22 PM, Ian Hickson (i...@hixie.ch) wrote:
I think it would make sense to allow vendors to treat these all
as
independent values (in particular, we wouldn't want IE to be
forced to
extend their interpretation of msapplication-TileColor
and
On 26 Jun 2014, at 20:45, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
I would like to reiterate that brand- is not a good prefix for this
purpose. It has nothing to do with brands, and much more to do with the app
or with system integration.
Major +1 here, seeing as this feedback
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
Interesting to see this would be only the second HTML attribute value to get
parsed as a simple color
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html#simple-color)
rather than a
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 22:24, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
Interesting to see this would be only the second HTML attribute value to get
parsed as a simple color
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
The spec does not suggest that it would be a simple color; it says to
allow any CSS color. simple color in HTML is solely a 6-digit hex
color.
In that case you want the same code path canvas uses. As well as
setting
On 26 Jun 2014, at 22:37, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 22:24, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
Interesting to see this would be only the second HTML attribute value to
get
22 matches
Mail list logo
