Re: Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-12-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
define reliably. markupid should never be used by anything other then wicket - we have never guaranteed its stability. did you ever create the rfe to have the id migrated when components are replaced? that is the only usecase i can think of where we need to worry about the id being stable so that

Re: Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-12-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Igor Vaynberg: define reliably. markupid should never be used by anything other then wicket - we have never guaranteed its stability. did you ever create the rfe to have the id migrated when components are replaced? that is the only usecase i can think of where we need to worry

Re: Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-12-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
hrm, i dont see how this can happen. once an id is created for a component that component keeps it for its entire lifetime - it is cached in the component's metadata. the counter is also nontransient so it keeps its value as long as the page is alive. can you recreate it using wicket tester?

Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Hi, I notice after upgrading from wicket 1.2 to current wicket-1.x that replaceWith() combined with an AjaxRequestTarget does not work anymore. I recall that you added smart markup ids with auto increments. So what I propose is to add to the migrate-1.3 wiki page the following,

Re: Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
our replace methods should migrate the id imho. please add an rfe. -igor On 11/26/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I notice after upgrading from wicket 1.2 to current wicket-1.x that replaceWith() combined with an AjaxRequestTarget does not work anymore. I