On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to
wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one
of you could double check please...
* You have included the license header test but not executed it?
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to
wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one
of you could double check please...
* You have
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Eelco
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Yes! :)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do
I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Yes! :)
Actually,
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, maybe not :) I tried:
cssIgnore = new String[] {
src/java/wicket/extensions/yui/calendar/assets/calendar.css
};
I normally just copy the string from the console output of the unit test
(without the prefix)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, maybe not :) I tried:
One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date
format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly
actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern
that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number
converters used by a
isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker?
it gets the format out of the converter
Yeah, with this code:
if (dateConverter == null)
{
// TODO this should be much easier and nicer to do in
2.0
IConverter
On 2/3/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Al, are you seriously working on date picker you want to contribute to
Wicket?
Yes, but it's really not very far along yet and I don't think we should
hold up 1.3 for it (certainly not the first beta at least).
Cool. We don't
10 matches
Mail list logo